Book Title: $JES 904 Compendium of Jainism (Jain Academic Bowl Manual 3rd Edition)
Author(s): JAINA Education Committee
Publisher: JAINA Education Committee

Previous | Next

Page 96
________________ PHILOSOPHY B11 - Anekantaväda I - Theory of Multiplicity and Shruta Jnän are examples of indirect Pramana and Avadhi Jnän, Manaha Paryava Jnän and Keval Jnän are examples of direct Pramana. 3. Naya (Partial Point of View) Any knowledge, which is true only for a given situation or from a given point of view is called Naya (a partial point of view). The thought activity, which grasps only one aspect of an object with the aid of scriptures, is called a partial point of view. Thus any statement made from one point of view can never be true from all aspects. The language to express this obvious paradox is known as Syädväda in Jain scriptures. Thus Syädväda is a theory of conditional predication and relativity of propositions and judgments. Emphasizing the limits of ordinary knowledge, Jainism developed the theory that truth is relative to the perspective Naya from, which it is known. Furthermore, because reality is many sided and particular knowledge is true only from a limited perspective, all knowledge claims are only tentative (Syät) just as in, "X may be Y," rather than "X is Y." This is known as the Syädväda (theory of relativity) or Anekantaväda (theory of multiplicity of viewpoints). Thus, doctrine of Syädväda or relativity states that the expression of truth is relative to different viewpoints. What is true from one point of view is open to question from another. Absolute truth cannot be grasped from any one particular viewpoint. Absolute truth is the total sum of individual partial truths from many different viewpoints, even if they seem to contradict each other. Like the blind men, each person perceives things from their own perspective. These perspectives are determined by many factors, including socio-cultural conditioning, particular place, time, circumstances, hopes, fears and, of course, subject to the limitation of our sensory perception, and reasoning power. When it is understood that knowledge is limited by the particular perspective from which it is achieved, it becomes easy to see that claims of knowledge are conditioned by the limitation of the perspective that it assumes and should always be expressed as only tentatively true. Just as the blind men should have been more circumspect, saying for example, "Standing here, feeling the object with my hands, it feels like a winnowing fan. This elephant may be looking like a winnowing fan." We must understand that any claims of knowledge should be asserted only conditionally. A deeper understanding of Anekäntaväda and Syädväda provides great insight into the problems of human interactions that cause conflict, grief, envy, and hatred. It teaches us to be tolerant towards other viewpoints. This allows us to live in harmony with people of different thinking. Similarly, it is highly applicable in understanding social problems and national strife. More importantly, these doctrines also provide ways of resolving global differences and conflicts. Total knowledge or organ of knowledge (Pramana Jnän) is the sum total of all partial points of view. Thus to understand a substance in its fullest form, one must have knowledge of all partial points of view including seemingly opposite partial points of view. Just as Pramana is pure knowledge, so also Naya is pure knowledge. The former grasps the entire thing, while the latter grasps only one of its many aspects. There are several different classifications of partial points of view given in scriptures. The detail on this can be found in the next chapter. 4. Nikshepa (Analysis of Truth) Analysis of truth can be done with precision and clarity in different ways. A substance has various attributes. Keeping those attributes in mind, a substance can be divided into different ways. Language is a means of communication. All practical exchange of knowledge has language for its main modality. When it is embodied in language, intangible knowledge becomes tangible and hence conveyable. Language is made up of words. The same word is employed to yield several meanings depending on the purpose or context. Employment of a word to express different meanings is done at least in four different ways. These four ways are known as Nikshepa. Page 96 of 398 Compendium of Jainism - 2015

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400