________________
व्याप्तिपञ्चकम्
एतद्घटत्वाभाववान् पटत्वादित्याद्येकव्यक्तिविपक्षके४० साध्याभावाधिकरणस्य यावत्त्वाप्रसिद्ध्या अव्याप्त्यापत्तेः । तथा च किञ्चिदनवच्छिन्नाया निरुक्तसाध्याभावाधिकरणताया व्यापकीभूतो योऽभावः हेतुतावच्छेदकसम्बन्धावच्छिन्नः तत्प्रतियोगितावच्छेदकहेतुतावच्छेदकवत्त्वं लक्षणार्थः ।
(४८) न च सत्त्वादिसामान्याभावस्यापि प्रमेयत्वादिना निरुक्त
subject 40 as in the case; 'this has the absence of this jar-ness because this is a cloth”. This is because the many-ness of the substratum of the absence of that which is to be established is not established. Therefore the meaning of the definition is that 'the state of having the determinant of the state of being a reason which (determinant) is the determinant of that counterpositive-ness determined by the relation, determinant of the state of being a reason, of the absence which is the pervasive of the state of being a substratum of the absence of that which is to be established which is mentioned as not determined by any
thing.
(48) Nor it should be said that there is a fault of too wide application in the inference; “it is a substance because it has existence.” This is because the absence of existence also is the pervasive of the state of being substratum of the absence of
40. एकव्यक्तिविपक्षके-Where one individual is contradictory example. In
this inference the absence of sādhya is the absence of absence of the fire-ness which is identical with that particular fireness, the locus of this form of absence of sādhya, is one individual fire alone. Therefore many locuses of that absence are not established.
