________________
११०
व्याप्तिपञ्चकम्
मणिकृता अनङ्गीकारात् । क्लृप्तेन पटत्वाद्यवच्छिन्नप्रतियोगित्वसम्बन्धेन च अभावे प्रमेयस्य सत्त्वेन तादृशसम्बन्धेन भ्रमत्वस्य वक्तुमशक्यत्वात् , पटत्वादेरन्वयितानवच्छेदकतया तदवच्छिन्नाप्रतियोगित्वसम्बन्धेन प्रमेयत्वादिविशिष्टस्यान्वये निराकाङ्क्षत्वाच्च, अन्यथा घटवति अपि घटो नास्तीत्यादेः प्रमात्वापत्तेः, तत्तद्घटत्वावच्छिन्नप्रतियोगित्वसम्बन्धेन घटविशिष्टस्य घटविशेषाभावस्य तत्र सत्त्वात् ।
(जा.३१) एतेन सत्तासमवायिनि अपि गुणादौ विशिष्टसत्तात्वावच्छिन्नस्य समवायेन असत्त्ववत् घटत्वाद्यवच्छिन्नप्रतियोगित्वसम्बन्धेन घटत्वावच्छिन्नवतोऽपि घटाद्यभावस्य न तादृशसम्बन्धेन प्रमेयत्वाद्य
and by known relation in the form of counter-positive-ness determined by cloth-ness the knowable exists in absence, therefore by this relation, it cannot be treated as error and because clothness is not determinant of state of having relation by the relation of counter-positive-ness determined by that, clothness there is no expectancy for the connection of that which is qualified by state of being knowable. Otherwise the notion that there would be no pot valid in the locus of a pot because there is absence of a particular pot which (absence) is qualified by the pot by the relation of counter-positive-ness determined by pot-ness.
(J.31) By this way, in quality etc. which is inherent of existence also, there that which is determined by the state of being qualified-existence dose not exist. In the same way the absence of a pot has that which is determined by pot-ness by the relation of counter-positive-ness determined by pot-ness, it
