Book Title: Vyaptipanchakam
Author(s): Gangesa, Mathuranath, Raghunath, Jagdish
Publisher: Shrutbhuvan Sansodhan Kendra

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 130
________________ ९४ व्याप्तिपञ्चकम् वैयधिकरण्यं तु प्रतियोगितावच्छेदकसम्बन्धेन प्रतियोग्यनधिकरणत्वघटितं बोध्यम् । तेन अयमात्मा ज्ञानादित्यादौ साध्याभाववतो घटादेविषयतया हेत्वाभावप्रतियोगिमत्त्वेऽपि नाव्याप्ति:६४ । (दी.८)हेत्वभावोऽपि प्रतियोगितावच्छेदकावच्छिन्नप्रतियोगिव्यधिकरणः । तत्प्रतियोगित्वञ्च हेतुतावच्छेदकरूपेण बोध्यं, the temporal relation. Non existence with its counter-positive in the absence of the reason should be known by the relation, which determined the counter-positive-ness, therefore 64there is no fault of too narrow application in the inference; 'this is soul because of knowledge', though jarness etc. which are substrata of the absence of that which is to be established, has the counter-positive-ness of the absence of reason by relation subject-ness. ___ (D.8) The absence of reason also should be known as non-co-exsisting with counter-positive, determined by the determinant of counter-positive-ness and that counter-positiveness also determined by the determinant of the state of being reason. Therefore there is no fault of too narrow application in the inference; where substernece-ness etc. is sādhya and conjunction, there is not absence of fire, therefore there is no fault of too wide application. 64. नाव्याप्ति:-No fault of too narrow application, when the locusness of counter-positive of the absence of reason is mentioned by relation in general. There would be fault of too narrow application in the inference; “it is soul because of knowledge.”

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173