________________
९४
व्याप्तिपञ्चकम्
वैयधिकरण्यं तु प्रतियोगितावच्छेदकसम्बन्धेन प्रतियोग्यनधिकरणत्वघटितं बोध्यम् । तेन अयमात्मा ज्ञानादित्यादौ साध्याभाववतो घटादेविषयतया हेत्वाभावप्रतियोगिमत्त्वेऽपि नाव्याप्ति:६४ ।
(दी.८)हेत्वभावोऽपि प्रतियोगितावच्छेदकावच्छिन्नप्रतियोगिव्यधिकरणः । तत्प्रतियोगित्वञ्च हेतुतावच्छेदकरूपेण बोध्यं,
the temporal relation. Non existence with its counter-positive in the absence of the reason should be known by the relation, which determined the counter-positive-ness, therefore 64there is no fault of too narrow application in the inference; 'this is soul because of knowledge', though jarness etc. which are substrata of the absence of that which is to be established, has the counter-positive-ness of the absence of reason by relation subject-ness.
___ (D.8) The absence of reason also should be known as non-co-exsisting with counter-positive, determined by the determinant of counter-positive-ness and that counter-positiveness also determined by the determinant of the state of being reason. Therefore there is no fault of too narrow application in the inference; where substernece-ness etc. is sādhya and
conjunction, there is not absence of fire, therefore there is no fault of
too wide application. 64. नाव्याप्ति:-No fault of too narrow application, when the locusness of
counter-positive of the absence of reason is mentioned by relation in general. There would be fault of too narrow application in the inference; “it is soul because of knowledge.”
