________________
७८
व्याप्तिपञ्चकम्
संयोगाभाववान् गुणत्वादित्यादावव्याप्त्यभावेऽपि न क्षतिरित्यपि वदन्ति ।
___ (जा.३) ननु साध्यवद्भिन्नो यः साध्याभाववान् इत्यर्थे साध्याभाववत्पदवैयर्थ्यं साध्यवद्भिन्नावृत्तित्वस्यैव सम्यक्त्वात्, न चावृत्तित्वेन समं साध्यवद्भिन्नस्यान्वयाविवक्षणात्, साध्याभाववता सममेव तादात्म्येनैवान्वयविवक्षणान्न वैयर्थ्यमिति वाच्यम् । तथा सति साध्यवद्भिन्नात्मको यो मतुबर्थः सम्बन्धी तदवृत्तित्वस्य सम्यक्त्वे साध्याभावपदवैयर्थ्यध्रौव्यात् । अतः सप्तमीसमाससामर्थ्य व्याचष्टेसाध्यवद्भिन्ने इति । is a quality,” there is no harm, this is said by author.
(J.3) This is the objection if the meaning is that which is different from that which has that which is to be established, possesses the absence of that which is to be established, the expression “that which has the absence of that which is to be established,” will be purposeless because, then the nonexistence in that which has that which is to be established only will be correct definition. Nor it should be said that-there is not useless-ness because the cementic relation of that which is different from that which has that which is to be established, is not with non-existence, but it is stated to be desired with that which has the absence of that which is to be established by the relation identity, eventhough non existence in that relatum which is the meaning of matup in the form of that which is different from that which has that which is to be established is correct. Then the expression 'absence of that which is to be established is indeed useless. Therefore author supporting seventh compound says “in that which is different from that
