Book Title: Scientific Secrets of Jainism Author(s): Nandighoshvijay Publisher: Research Institute of Scientific Secrets from Indian Oriental Scriptures AhmedabadPage 45
________________ 14 Scientific Secrets of Jainism In short all four equations of Einstein are useless for the object, having greater velocity than that of the photon particles. While the most learned scientists believe that the equations of classical physics must give a satisfactory interpretation of all physical phenomena from micro to macro i.e. atomic and sub-atomic particle world and the great heavenly bodies. But as we have shown above, the equations of the theory of special relativity can't give satisfactory interpretation of the modern sub-atomic particles and heavenly bodies having a greater velocity than light-velocity. So our scientists have to make a special research in this field and they have to put forth scientific secrets, shown by our Indian philosophical tradition, before the world with a modern scientific method. I know very well that this being extremely difficult task, it cannot be done by a single scientist. And it can be done by a team of scientists, who have dedicated their life to science and philosophy. I wish that all the scientists will give me enough co-operation in this extremely difficult task. N.B. This article had been, originally, written fifteen years ago and I had made a statement that according to Jain philosophy, the velocity of light is not constant and any material particle or object may have greater velocity than that of light. Till now all physicists have accepted that the velocity of light is constant and no particle has velocity greater than light velocity according to the postulates of Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity. Recently, in research carried out in US, particle physicists like Dr Lijun Wang etc. of the NEC Research Institute in Princeton have shown that light particle can be accelerated up to 300 times their normal velocity of 1,86,000 miles per second (3,00,000 km per second). Of course, according to the report given in 'The Times of India' dated June 5, 2000, details of the findings remain confidential because they have been submitted to Nature for review prior to possible publication. Regarding this the famous scientist Dr J. V. Narlikar says in his article This is not against any result of relativity. Because, the point of intersection has a geometrical existence only; it has no physical status. No material particle is sitting at that point. While relativity tells you that no material Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.orgPage Navigation
1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378