Book Title: Lord Mahavira Vol 01
Author(s): S C Rampuria
Publisher: Jain Vishva Bharati Institute

Previous | Next

Page 119
________________ 110 Lord Mahâvîra of earth, water, fire and wind. The same doctrine was, according to James D' Alwis, held by Nigantha Nâtaputta: "He held that it was sinful to drink cold water:-'cold water, he said, was imbued with a soul. Little dropes of water were small souls and large drops were large souls.” In Buddhaghosa's commentary on the Dhammapadam (Fausböll's edition p. 398), the better Niganthas' who go about naked, say that they cover their almsbowls lest particles of dust or spray, imbued with life, should fall into them. Compare Kalpasútra, Sâmâchârî $ 29, where a similar rule is given. These naked Niganthas need not have been of the Digambara sect, for according to the Achârânga Sûtra it was considered a meritorious, not a necessary, penance for an ascetic to wear no clothes. In the Magávajja Sutta, vi. 31, 1, Nigantha Nâtaputta is said to hold the kiriyâvâda opposed to the akiriyàvâda, or the belief in the cardinal dogmas of the Jinas, and is found in their creed in the first chapter of the Achâràñga. James d’Alwis proceeds after the above quoted passage: "He [Nâtaputta] also declared that there were three dandas or agents for the commission of sin, and that the acts of the body (kaya), of the speech (vâch), and of the mind (mana) were three separate causes, each acting independently of the other.” Compare the subjoined passage from the third uddesaka of the Sthânânja, in which the term danda in its relation to mind, speech and body occurs: iao demda pannatta, tam jahâ: mana-damde, vaidamde kâya-damde. “There are declared three dandas, namely, the danda of the mind, the danda of the speech, the danda of the body.” Thus far all agrees with Jainism. James d'Alwis's account of Nâtaputta's doctrines concludes: "This heretic asserted that crimes and virtues, happiness and misery, were fixed by fate, that as subject to these we cannot avoid them, and that the practice of the doctrines concludes : “This heretic asserted that crimes and virtues, happiness and misery, were fixed by fate, that as subject to these we cannot avoid them, and that the practice of the doctrine can in no way assist us. In this notion his heresy consisted.” As the Jaina opinions on these points do not materially differ from those of the Hindus in general, and as the doctrines defined above are inconsistent with the kiriyâuâda and with ascetic practices. I do not doubt that the Buddhas committed an error, perhaps in

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320