Book Title: Jaina Theory of Multiple Facets of Reality and Truth
Author(s): Nagin J Shah
Publisher: B L Institute of Indology

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 69
________________ A Study of Syādvāda 51 view (naya-vākya), each being synonymous with saptabhangī-pramāņa and saptabhangi-naya respectively... Pramāna-vākyais defined thus: 'Acomplete statement is simultaneously expressive of an entity, which is known to be of infinite natures through the right knowledge (prāmāņa), by laying a primary emphasis upon what exists as being non-distinct, or by superimposing non-distinction upon distinction, according to time etc.' (PNT IV. 44; SBT p.36)' That is, either by laying the primary emphasis on the non-distinctive features viz. uniform state of attributes (dharma) and their locus (dharmin) taking into account eight kinds of determinants 'time' etc., or by temporarily identifying attributes with their locus when viewed from *time' etc., the complete statement expresses an entity composed of infinite natures simultaneously. On the other hand, the statement' is defined thus: Either by laying the primary emphasis on the distinction or by superimposing distinction upon non-distinction, the partial statement expresses in succession the attributes of an entity like a pot etc., which is known by means of particular view-point (naya). (RA IV, 45; SBT p.32) The difference between the two statements lies in the following three points: (1) In the complete statement, the entire reality is comprehended synthetically, i.e. with all attributes taken together; while in the partial statement, the reality is considered analytically, i.e. with its attributes taken one by one. (2) In the former, primary emphasis is laid on the non-distinction (abheda-vịtti) or union is superimposed on distinction (abhedopacāra), thus the distinction emerges into union, and in the latter the difference is primarily emphasized (bheda-vịtti) or distinction is superimposed on the difference among attributes (bhedopacara). Here non-distinction emerges into distinction and thus the expression invariably assumes the individual or consecutive form. 7. pramāna-pratipannānanta-dharmātmaka-vastunah kālādibhir abheda-vytti-prādhānyad abhedopacāräd vā yaugapadyena pratipadakam vacaḥ sakalādeśaḥ (PNT IV, 44). Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168