Book Title: Jaina Theory of Multiple Facets of Reality and Truth
Author(s): Nagin J Shah
Publisher: B L Institute of Indology

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 99
________________ The Logical Structure of Syādvāda 81 One could also add: If p is indeterminate, Mp is true, but Lp (i.e. Necessarily p) is false. And this is in tune with the basic insight of the Jaina logicians when they claim that Ekāntavāda (i.e. insisting upon partial truth as if it were the whole truth; insisting upon an indeterminate view as if it were necessarily true) amounts to a fallacy of naya (nayābhāsa or durnaya). This justification seems to be prima facie intelligible, but it is doubtful whether it gives a true picture of what Jainas mean by the term syāt in syādvāda. It seems rather incorrect to identify 'incomplete truth' or 'partial truth' with indeterminateness. That a naya is 'partially true' implies that it is true in a certain respect and certainly true in that respect. Naya is also partially false because it is false in some other respect and certainly false in that other respect. Truth or falsehood of naya does not imply any kind of uncertainty', whereas indeterminateness does involve a kind of uncertainty. This partialness of truth in the case of nayas is made explicit in syādvāda by applying the prefix syāt to nayastatements. 'Syāt, therefore, does not mean ‘may be', 'perhaps', 'possibly', or 'probably'. But it rather means 'in a certain way', 'in some respect' etc. This is the meaning of the term kathancit which is generally used as the synonym for the term syāt in syādvāda. The modern scholars like Muni Nathmal and B.K. Matilal bring this out and also repudiate in a way the claim that syadvāda could be rendered as a case for modal logic. But while interpreting syāt as ‘in come respect, instead of possibly', some modern scholars also give a different explanation of syādvāda by rendering syāt-statements as conditional statements of a kind. This leads us to the third model, which I call the model of conditionality. 9. Muni Nathmal emphasises this point by distinguishing between syādvāda and aniscayavāda. See Muni Nathmal: Jaina Darsana, Manana aura Mimāṁsā (Hindi Book), Adarśa Sahitya Sangha Prakāśana, Churu, (Rajasthan), Revised Ed. 1973. Prof. B. K. Matilal too is insistent on this point. See his article "Saptabhangi" included in J.N. Mohanty and S. P. Banerjee (Ed.) Self, Knowledge and Freedom, The World Press Private Ltd., Calcutta, 1978. pp. 162-64. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168