Book Title: Jaina Theory of Multiple Facets of Reality and Truth
Author(s): Nagin J Shah
Publisher: B L Institute of Indology

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 115
________________ Nyāya Criticism of Anekānta 97 and negative as well as mutually non-contradictory in regard to one and the same object, as a reply to some question, on the ground of means of knowledge which (means) is drsta and desirable.8 Then Bhāsarvajña explains the application of anekānta following almost verbatim the text of Akalanka's Tattvārthavārtika. The editor, Svāmi Yogîndrānanda seems to believe that Bhāsarvajña has verbatim quoted the passage from Tattvārthavārtika and hence he puts the passage into inverted commas which (marks) are not found in the notostat of Nyāyabhūsana.As a matter of fact, Bhāsarvajña has parapharased the TAV text in his own way Now, according to the anekānta, a pot exists from the viewpoint of its own nature and it does not exist from the viewpoint of the nature of another thing. One's own nature means an indicative sign on the basis of which, the word 'ghata' is employed and the cognition of ghata arises. And parātman of a pot is that in respect of which the word ghata’ and its cognition are not employed."O Now if a pot does not exist even from the point of view of its own nature, then the verbal communication such as 'a pot' would not be possible in respect of it. Similarly, if a pot is taken to be existing even from the viewpoint of the nature of another thing, then it would give licence to use the word 'pața' for 'ghata'also. It is, therefore, concluded that a pot exists from the viewpoint of its own nature, and the same pot can be said to be non-existent from the viewpoint of the nature of another thing." The potness and non-potness as desired to be described with the modes stated above, are not mutually different. Indeed if they are taken to be different, the words ‘a pot' and 'a non-pot' cannot be employed in respect of the same object, and accordingly such cognitions also would not arise in regard to the same thing. And if the potness and non-potness are taken to be different, there would not be the same 8. Nyayabhūşaņa, p.554. 9. Ibid, p.554. See photostat p.276, L.D. Institute of Indology, Ahmedabad. 10. Nyāyabhusana, p.554. 11. Nyayabhusana, p.554. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168