Book Title: Jaina Theory of Multiple Facets of Reality and Truth
Author(s): Nagin J Shah
Publisher: B L Institute of Indology

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 75
________________ A Study of Syāduāda 57 on the principle of syādvāda doctrine. Eight kinds of such apparent fallacy are enumerated and then they are refuted one by one. They are (1) contradiction (virodha), (2) non-coexistence (vaiyadhikaranya, absence of common abode), (3) regressus ad infinitum (anavasthā), (4) confusion (samkara), (5) transfusion (vyatikara, exchange of function and attributes), (6) doubt (samsaya), (7) absence of determination (apratipatti), (8) renouncement of determination of subjective reality (visaya-vyavasthā-hāni). 1. Contradiction It is impossible that contradictory attributes, 'universality' and particularity' which are each affirmative and negative natures abide together in a single entity, as the case of heat and cold. This is the fallacy of contradiction. 2. Non-coexistence The locus of affirmation cannot be locus of negation, since there might be also difference of locus because of their being of one form. This is the fallacy of non-coexistence. (vaiyadhikaranya=vibhinnadhikaranavrttitva, SBT p.82) 3. Regressus ad infinitum When a thing is universal from one aspect, say sva-rūpa, and particular from another aspect, say para-rūpa, both aspects are correlative due either to one nature or to double nature viz. astitva and nāstitva. In 9. The term 'virodha' is mentioned in the original stanza of Hemacandra (VS 824). It is understood to signify primarily a particular virodha in the narrow sense and then indicate, by way of implication, the remaining dosa begining with vaiyadhikaranya. Or it is understood in the general sense of doșa, and thus includes each member viz. virodha, vaiyadhikaranya etc. There is divergence of opinion about the classification of doșa, Vädideva defines only seven kinds of such fallacies, and quotes the following stanza: samsaya-virodha-vaiyadhikaranyam athobhayam dosāḥ/ anavasthä-vyatikaram api jaina-mate sapta doșāḥ syuḥ// (SRA V, 8) It is very likely that Akalarka is the first to put forward the refutation of such fallacies. (Pramāṇasamgraha op. cit., III 24, VI 55) Cf. Akalankagranthatraya op. cit., Intr. p.105; Anekāntajayapatākā op. cit., pp. 258-260. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168