Book Title: Jaina Psychology Author(s): Mohanlal Mehta Publisher: Sohanlal Jain Dharm Pracharak Samiti AmrutsarPage 54
________________ CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION 37 the range of negation, the sixth means of valid cognition that establishes non-existence. Hence, it is proved that the self does not exist. This is, in brief, the view of the opponent-the thesis. Lord Mahāvīra refutes the arguments of the opponent in the following way: "O Indrabhūti! the self is indeed directly cognisable to you also. Your knowledge about it which consists of doubts etc., is itself the self. What is proved by your own experience should not be proved by other means of knowledge. No proof is required to prove the existence of happiness, misery, etc. "Or, the self is directly experienced owing to 'ahampratyaya'the realization as 'I' in 'I did, I do, and I shall do'-the realization which is associated with the functions pertaining to all the three tenses. "If there is no soul, how do you realise 'I'? How can there be a doubt whether the self is or not? Or, if there is a doubt in whose case is this experience of 'I' justifiable?"1 This argument is offered from the psychological point of view. The various aspects of knowledge, i.e., recollection, recognition, doubt, judgment, etc., can never occur in our experience unless there is the existence of soul. All these psychological functions are centred in a conscious principle which cannot be taken to be material. Cognition, affection, and conation cannot be explained unless the existence of an immaterial entity be admitted. Mahāvīra further argues that without a doubter who is beyond all kinds of doubt, but still remains in all doubts, no doubt is possible. Doubt presupposes the existence of a doubter. "If the object about which one has doubt is certainly non-existent, who has a doubt as to whether I do exist or I do not exist? Or, Gautama (Indrabhūti)! When you yourself are doubtful about yourself, what can be free from doubt?" He further says: "The self which is the substratum of its attributes is self-evident owing to the attributes being self-evident, as is the case with a pitcher. For, on realizing the attributes, the substratum, too, is realised." Let us explain the 1 Viseṣāvasyaka-bhāṣya, 1554-6. 2 Ibid., 1557 3 Ibid., 1558.Page Navigation
1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238