Book Title: Jaina Psychology
Author(s): Mohanlal Mehta
Publisher: Sohanlal Jain Dharm Pracharak Samiti Amrutsar

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 106
________________ SENSORY AND MENTAL COMPREHENSION 89 Now, an objection may be raised against the very notion of recognition. We do not come across any phenomenon called recognition, which is given out as an independent category of congnition, as anything different from the two cognitive acts, viz., 'recollection indicated by the form that' and 'perception' indicated by the word "this.' When both these mental processes are in fusion, we derive the notion of recognition. Thus, strictly speaking, recognition is not separate factor of our cognition. This contention is not a sound one. Recognition is not merely a combination of recollection and perception but something more. The object of recognition is the entity that stands out as the identity in and through its precedent and subsequent states. This identity cannot be the content of recollection, since recollection cognises only what has been perceived before. As has been stated: Recollection cognises only what has been known before and refers to its content as 'that,' whereas recognition establishes the identity of a past datum with a present one in the form that is this.' Therefore, the content of recognition is certainly different from the datum of recollection.2 Nor can this identity be the content of perception which is confined to the present state of an object only. In other words, the province of perceptual cognition is limited to what is actually present and given to the senses. “That which is in direct contact with the senses and actually present, is directly grasped by the senses of sight and the like. Hence, the identity of a past object and a present datum cannot lie within the jurisdiction of sensory perception. Therefore, we are justified to conclude that the province of recognition is different from that of recollection and perception. No doubt, recognition is a synthetic judgment born of perception and recollection, but it cannot be regarded as the mere combination of the two, inasmuch as it is a new state of the mind as a unitary cognition. Hence, it is not a sound contention that there is no cognition different from perception and recollection, for recognition is a different state of 1 Pūri'āparākāraikadhurīnar hi drauyam pratvah hijñānasya vişayah. Commentary on Pramāna-mimāṁsā, 1, 2, 4. 2 Pūrvapramitamätre hi jāvate sa iti smrtih. Sa evāyamitīyam tu pratyabhijñātire kini. Tattva-sangraha, 453, 3 Sambaddham vartamānam ca grhyate cakşuyādinā. Sloka-vārttika, IV, 84. 12

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238