Book Title: Theory of Karman in Indian Thought
Author(s): Koshelya Walli
Publisher: Bharat Manisha

Previous | Next

Page 190
________________ [ 178 1 are destroyed by knowledge but those which are committed after the origin of knowledge do not attach themselves ( aśleşa ya ) to the person concerned. It is pointed in the commentary that the opinion that sins are not attached to a person on whom knowledge of Brahma has dawned, is based on the statement of the Śrutil which says that just as the lotus flower is not tainted by water, likewise the man with true knowledge is not tainted by sin. This is regarding sins committed after knowledge. The sins com nitted before the knowledge are destroyed according to Śruti quoted by Sankara.2 The statement of the Srutis implies the destruction of all karmas on the rise of immediate intuition on Brahma as indicated in the following statement. There is no doubt that karmas possess an inherent potency to give rise to fruits. This is true. What is suggested is that the Sakti or potency is not denied but by the higher potency of knowledge, the lower potency of karma is obstructed in its manifestation. Another question arises in connection with the effect of Brahmajñāna. It relates itself to dharma or merit and not to the sins. It is pointed out that even the virtuous acts follow the same course of action on the rise of Brahmajñāna. In other words the bearing of knowledge or karma is the same whether the karma is good or evil. This being the case, true liberation follows on the fall of the present body of a wise person because neither merit nor demerit have anything to do with a wise person. All this is true in the case of actions which have not commenced to fructify. In the case of prārabdha karma namely the karma which has begun to bear fruit, the above rule does not apply. Sankara has dealt with this problem in his commentary,5 The accumulated 1. Brahmasūtrabhāşyam IV, 1,13, 2. Mundaka Upanişad 2/2/8 quoted by Sankara, 3. Chándogya Upanişad 5/24/3 quoted by Sarkara, 4. In this connection see the Critique of the Brahmasūtra 3.2.11 to 4 of Kon, H. Modi, year 1943, pp. 332-34 5. 5. Sankarabhāşya on Brahmasūtra IV, 1, 15,

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377