________________
E. Leumann, An outline of the Avaśyaka Literature
53
135 433. 420 f. 434. 443 f. 454-466]
385 f. 3896. 390
3872 3873-3875 3876-3878 3879-3891
54-56 57-59
60 61 f. 63-66 67-70
3600 3603-3605 3607-3610 f.
3613 3618. 3620
3625-3628 225-228 [II 265 f. 3688.3689*
269 cp. 3691f. 270-274 3693-3697 275-281 3699-3705 285-288] 3706-3709
3906
392–394
107 f. 1094 cp.
1096 114-116 122-125 127-131
1311 132-135
3918-3921 3922-3926
3927
397 f. 406.
409 418-420
916
cp.
2888
136-138
niry. X
524-9
60
43 4511 4536
Table D 3: Vis. V 491-799. Niry. X Viś. V niry. X 2.4
491.495 5a
497b 26 f.
535 f. 10
542-544 545 f.
47 550
486 35 cp. 553
57 f. 36.391 555. 559
67
Viś. V 657-662
681 6826
698 700-703a
538
461-3
Vis. V
592 598. 600
601 f. 603-605
606 cp. 608. 609a cp. 6100
616.627 653-655
cp. 67 686.69 cp:
466
30 1-3 305.4
706
71 749
316
7379
.
759
- 76 83 f.
521-3
1
788 f.
Prior works used by Jinabhadra in Vis. I
Jinabhadra did not only find an Anuyogadvāra-segment in the introduction to the Kalpabhāsya, but actually the first half of that introduction touches upon most of what Jinabhadra deals with before the uvagghāya-nijjutti starts in Av.-niry. II 61. Sanghadāsa has understandably taken the Nandī into consideration before the Anuyogadvāra, and besides that he has consulted and explained a number of stanzas from Av.-niry. I & II (I 1. 19 f. 23 f. 78. II 138. 28. 52-55. 56o. 60). That is why his first 362 stanzas correspond to the majority of the first 1482 stanzas in Jinabhadra's Bhāsya. As this numerical proportion shows, although it often follows that of Sanghadāsa word for word, in general, Jinabhadra's handling is much more detailed. Many times he goes back to the assumed basic works (Nandi and Anuyogadvāra). Two samples of contents from both authors can be found below, p. 40° -30 &
42 24-61
A source that touches only a particular part of the mentioned stanza-area has been lost. We learn from the commentaries, that Vis. I 116 & 127 come from a Pūrva. Both of the stanzas will be dealt with thoroughly (naturally on the basis of the Pūrva-tradition in question), so that the Pūrva-segment fills the stanzas I 116-152. In any case, by Pūrva is meant the JñānapravādaPūrva that describes five jñāna-types (as Abhayadeva and others correctly notice), and, therefore, will have formed the source of the Nandi as well as of the Nandi-chapter Av.-niry. I. Thus, for this passage Jinabhadra simply goes back to the source of his model. He will be doing this to a lesser degree also elsewhere in his work without
98
Jain Education International
For Personal & Private Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
