Book Title: Jain Inscriptions of Rajasthan
Author(s): Ramvallabh Somani
Publisher: Rajasthan Prakrit Bharti Sansthan Jaipur

Previous | Next

Page 31
________________ 24 ] and Gurjars. The Digambar Jain Kirti Stambh inscriptions from Chittor, edited48 by the Author, reveal that Digambar Jain ascetics were venerated by Hamir Chauhan as well as many rulers of Deccan. The period falling between Jaitra singh and Samar singh (13th century A.D.) was glorious period for Chittor when several beautiful Jain temples were constructed and many festivities were arranged. Regular patronage was extended for the purpose of building these temples by rulers and the members of the royal family. Many inscriptions testify to this fact, which is corroborated by literary references too. During the 14th and 15th century A.D. Maharana Kheta, Lakha, Mokal and Kumbha made several donations to Jain temples. They believed in religious tolerance and patronising all religions. The Chittor inscription of V.E. 1495 (1438 A.D.) and the Ranakpur inscription49 of V.E. 1496 (1439 A.D.) provide crucial data for study of the history of Mewar. The genealogy of the rulers of Mewar given in the Ranakpur inscription provides authentic information and remains the main source for studying the achievements of Kumbha during the early years of his reign. Likewise, the Nadlai inscription50 of V.E. 1557 (1500 A.D.) of the time of Maharana Raymal, the Sadari inscription5l of V.E. 1654 (1595 A.D.) and the Shatrunjay inscription52 of V.E. 1587 (1530 A.D) containing the genealogy of the rulers of Mewar also furnish valuable details concerning the medieval history of Mewar. On the basis of the Sadari inscription53 of V.E. 1654 (1595 A.D.), belonging to the family of Bhama Shah, when read alongwith the colophons of the MSS. of Gora Badal Edited by the Author in the Anekant Vol. XXII No. I/Joharapurakar. Jain Lekh Sangrah (Delhi 1974) Vol. V. pp. 153-155. An Rep A.S.I. 1907-1908 pp.21/Jin Vijay No, 307/The Maharana Kumbha by the Author p. 425. Jin Vijay No. 336. The year 1597 (150AD) given in the text is incorrect. The correct date of it is V, E, 1557 (1500 A, D.). The Etihasika Sodh Sangrah by the Author pp. 69-71/The Bhavanagar inscriptions pp. 144. Jin Vijay No. I/E. I, Vol. II pp. 42-47. For details-see Author's paper on Bhama Shah published in the Murudhar Kesari Abhinandan-Granth pp. 173-177, 51. 53. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 ... 350