Book Title: Harmless Soul
Author(s): W J Johnson, Dayanand Bhargav
Publisher: Motilal Banarasidas

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 143
________________ Kundakunda: The Pravacanasāra 129 particular contact or touch, stickiness or dryness, be connected with material karman (karmapudgala) which has those qualities? To see how Kundakunda (and Amṛtacandra) attempt to answer this question, we must look in detail at the gāthās following Pravacanaṣāra 2.81.10 At 2.82, we are told that although the jiva is without rūpa, etc. (as enumerated at 2.81), itself, nevertheless, it sees and knows (pecchadi jāṇādi) substances (dravya) which have rupa, etc., and that the mechanism of bondage is analagous to this. Thus the jiva, which consists of upayoga, having attained to various objects (of the senses), is infatuated, attached or averse, and so it is combined with them.11 The Tattvadipikā (on 2.83) explains that the atman, composed of upayoga, meeting with various distinct forms / objects, betakes itself (samupaiti; sam-upa- vi) to moha, rāga, or dveṣa. And because the innate nature of the atman (ātmasvabhāva) is 'coloured' (uparakta) by moha, etc., which are conditioned or modified by the 'other' (parapratyaya) (i.e. the ajīva, the 'various objects'), like a crystal gem whose nature is coloured by the objects close to it, so the atman becomes itself 'bondage' (bandha) because it is paired with their natures (tadbhāvadvitīyatvāt). The gist of this seems to be that passions are generated in the atman by proximity to objects, that such passions are modifications of the upayoga which characterises the atman, and that this is what constitutes bondage. In other words, the ātman binds itself through its own upayoga. On the one hand, this gāthā and its commentary seem to be harking back to earlier ideas about the soul being 10 Since there is a good deal of repetition in these verses, in what follows I shall rely more on summary than direct quotation; the relevant gāthās are Pravac. 2:81-2:97. 11 Pravac. 2:83. There is some ambiguity here over whether tehim refers to the sense-objects or to the passional states; Upadhye translates it as referring to the latter, although it amounts to the same thing. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372