Book Title: Harmless Soul
Author(s): W J Johnson, Dayanand Bhargav
Publisher: Motilal Banarasidas

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 161
________________ Kundakunda: The Pravacanasāra 147 only been thought to be so through the supposition of an, in reality, non-existent relationship between jīva and ajīva.51 The corollary of this view - that the jīva binds itself through false consciousness or moha - is that it can liberate itself by attaining true or pure consciousness via meditational techniques which lead to the realisation of that fact. Since this false consciousness takes the form of a delusion that the self is in some way connected to the material world, when in fact it is intrinsically and always pure, then it is only a short step to the conclusion that the world of matter, and especially material karman, is less 'real' than the and even totally unreal. By the same token, it is possible to conclude that the soul was never really bound but only thought to be so. And these are in fact very close to positions taken by Kundakunda in the Samayasāra, although, as we have seen, there are also gāthās in the Pravacanasāra where they are strongly suggested, for instance, at 2.101. It is worth looking briefly at Amộtacandra's commentary on this last passage (Pravacanasāra 2.101) as an example of the direction Jaina theory can take once karman has been effectively dematerialised. (And it is probable that the commentator uses his knowledge of the Samayasāra to provide himself with an interpretative framework here.) The text reads: Bodies, goods, pleasures and sufferings, enemies and friends are not eternal for the soul (jīva). Eternal is the self (ātman) that consists of upayogu. 51 The ontological status of samsāra vis à vis the kevalin's omniscience cannot be entered into here; nor can there be consideration of what it can mean to 'know' something without having any relationship with it. However, the gist seems to be that the kevalin is in some sense co-extensive with samsāra - even the 'creator' of it - and so, in effect, the object of the kevalin's knowledge is itself alone, the self and what it knows being synonymous. See especially Book 1 of the Pravacanasāra, 1:23-1:36 (discussed below). Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372