Book Title: Harmless Soul
Author(s): W J Johnson, Dayanand Bhargav
Publisher: Motilal Banarasidas

Previous | Next

Page 261
________________ Kundakunda: The Samayasāra 247 wrong-believer and not of the Arhat faith. But it should be known that whoever holds the doctrine that the self that acts is other than the self that experiences is a wrongbeliever and not of the Arhat faith. Here the two views relate to whether an object is viewed with regard to its modes (paryāya) or to its substance (dravya). To take either perspective as the exclusive truth about an object would be one-sided (ekānta) and the mark of a wrong-believer. According to this reading, the self is neither the same as nor different from the doer and experiencer. Right-belief, or 'right-view', entails knowing that both views are valid depending on the perspective taken. Unlike the distinction made above (Samayasāra 14, etc.), this is clearly compatible with anekāntavāda doctrine; one view (i.e. the dravya perspective) is not higher, more 'real', or truer than the other (the paryāya perspective); they are complementary. However, the very fact that the dravya perspective deals with what is fundamental or essential, while the paryāya is a mode of that dravya, indicates at least the potential for a logical hierarchy of truth. It might be thought that the anekāntavāda-compatible version of the 'two truths' doctrine opens up the possibility of a 'third' view, one which reconciles or synthesises both statements. However, the strictures of the syādvāda doctrine ensure that, rather than a true overview, such a synthesis could only take the form of a perception that the vyavahāra and niścaya perspectives are merely views, and therefore neither is to be taken as exclusively true. Indeed, to ensure this is the function of the classical sapta-bhanginaya formulation as a whole.30 On the other hand, such passages as Samayasāra 141ff. (=151ff. JGM)31 are not readily explicable in syādvāda terms. Indeed, they seem more like an attempt to discard 30 See JPP pp. 94-97; and Dixit 1971 p. 24ff. for the possible historical development of this doctrine. 31 See pp. 236ff. above, and the following. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372