Book Title: Harmless Soul
Author(s): W J Johnson, Dayanand Bhargav
Publisher: Motilal Banarasidas

Previous | Next

Page 156
________________ 142 Harmless Souls is involved with the non-soul (including material karman), then the implication is that, since in reality the jīva has no connection with anything material, it cannot in reality be bound by karman. To believe otherwise amounts to moha, and it is this which is the 'fact' of the soul's bondage. Consequently, the belief that material karman can bind the non-material soul takes over karmapudgala's binding (i.e. its only) function, and Kundakunda has, in effect, internalised or dematerialised karman; bondage is now a matter of delusion, a false attitude manifested in a feeling of possessiveness with regard to the material (everything that is ajīva).36 The emphasis on moha, defined as the delusion that the self and the 'other' have any connection with or influence on each other, renders any 'two-cause' system of bondage - whatever the material and instrumental causes - effectively redundant. For how can something which does not and cannot really have any connection with what it is supposed in part to act upon be cited as a cause, material or otherwise? Furthermore, since it is the self's contact with paradravya, including material karman, that is a delusion, then it is paradravya / material karman that becomes, from the soteriological perspective, an irrelevance: in the characterisation of the Tattvadipikā on Pravacanasāra 2.101, 'unreal' (asat).37 In short, the stress on moha points to a solution to the problem of bondage beyond that attempted through the standard use of the vyavahāra / niscaya distinction. (The way in which moha arises, whether it is self-generated and how, or whether it is, like the Vedāntic avidyā, inexplicable, is not dealt with in this text; and for practical purposes it is probably considered 36 In this context, we may recall gāthā 1.46 (quoted p. 121, above): 'There would be no samsāra for any embodied jīva if the ātman itself, through its own nature, did not become auspicious or inauspicious.' Again this puts the 'blame' for bondage squarely on the ātman itself; the process is self-contained and internal. 37 For comments on this, see below. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372