Book Title: Harmless Soul
Author(s): W J Johnson, Dayanand Bhargav
Publisher: Motilal Banarasidas

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 148
________________ 134 Harmless Souls not only fails to bind fresh (abhinava) karman, but it also rids itself of old karman, and so liberates itself (i.e. absence of rāga functions as both samvara and nirjarā). It is clearly, therefore, modification into attachment (rāgapari ṇāma) which is the 'real' bondage (that is to say, according to this view, it is the prime or ultimate cause of bondage). What precisely is being claimed here, and what are we supposed to understand by the use of vyavahāra and niscaya in this context? In an attempt to clarify this, I shall construct a theoretical model to test against the text. And it is worth remembering that, freed from the commentary, this section of the Pravacanasara has all the appearance in its present form of being a compilation of gāthās on bondage, and so may represent different layers of doctrine. First, it should be noted that Pravacanasāra 2.97, which draws the line under this section on bondage, says that this description of the bondage of the jiva has been preached by Arahants for yatis (ascetics) from the niscaya point of view, whereas another point of view, the vyavahāra one, is preached for others (i.e. the laity). In other words, this is a teaching aimed specifically at śramaņas. The vyavahāra view, which is not preached here, is, as we have seen, outlined in the commentary (Tattvadīpikā) on 2.82. It amounts to this: dravyabandha (karmapudgala) is the cause of bondage, for it is karmapudgala, through occupying the same pradeśas as the jiva, which brings about the modification of consciousness (upayoga) into raga, dveṣa and moha (subha and aśubha),21 which in turn is the cause of further bondage (i.e. it 'sets off the binding of further karman). The niscaya view is that it is bhāvabandha (subha- and asubha-upayoga) which is the cause of bondage, since, although karmapudgala occupies the same pradeśas as the jīva, there is no contact (sparśa) between the two. Rather, their contiguity 'sets off' in the jiva self-transformations into 21 See Pravac 2·88. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372