________________
CONTENTS.
Book 5. Ode 4 .
» 6. Odes I, 9 » 10. Odes 8,11 » II. Ode 6 ,
15. Ode I.
. . . .
. . .
. .
. .
. .
. . .
. .
. . .
PAGE
437 . 438 . 440
442 • 444
THE HSIÅ O.
INTRODUCTION.
CHAP.
I. THE NAME OF THE CLASSIC; ITS EXISTENCE BEFORE THE
HAN DYNASTY; ITS CONTENTS, AND BY WHOM IT WAS
WRITTEN. . . . . . . . . 449 Meaning of the character Hsiao. Was the treatise called the Hsiao King by Confucius? It existed before the Han dynasty during the time of the Kau. It came, probably, from the school of Băng-jze.
II. THE RECOVERY OF THE HSIÃO UNDER THE HAN
DYNASTY, AND ITS PRESERVATION DOWN TO THE PUBLICATION OF THE COMMENTARY OF THE THANG
EMPEROR HSÜAN ZUNG . . . . . . 452 Recovery of the Hsiao. The shorter or modern text. The old or longer text. Was another copy in the old text discovered? Can we fully rely on the copies catalogued by Lia Hin? From Khung An-kwo to the emperor Hsüan Zung. The emperor's work. Hsing Ping's work.
458
III. CRITICISM OF THE HSIẢO SINCE THE THANG DYNASTY
Works on the old text by Sze-ma Kwang and Fan 30-yü. Sceptical criticism ;-views of Ka Hsi and Wa Khăng. Conclusion regarding the genuineness and integrity of the Hsiao. Note on the translation.
.
. 465
1. The Scope and Meaning of the Treatise . . 2. Filial Piety in the Son of Heaven . . . 3. Filial Piety in the Princes of States. .
Filial Piety in High Ministers and Great Officers 5. Filial Piety in Inferior Officers. 6. Filial Piety in the Common People . . . 7. Filial Piety in Relation to the Three Powers .
. .
. 471 .
Digitized by Google
