Book Title: Structure and Functions of Soul in Jainism
Author(s): S C Jain
Publisher: Bharatiya Gyanpith

Previous | Next

Page 22
________________ 18 :: Structure and Functions of Soul in Jainism said that the distinctive feature of the anekānta theory lies in the affirmation of opposites in the same real. Reality does not merely admit of multiple forms of existence; but it is, at the same time, a substrate of opposite elements. The other meaning of the term anekānta may be taken as the antithesis of ekānta, i.e., an absolutism. An absolutism affirms one uniform character of reality, and the non-absolutism denies such an affirmation. Vidyānandin says, “Anekānta means the negation of the absolutism of existence, non-existence, permanence and momentariness.” If reality is held to be absolutely permanent as in Vedānta, the non-absolutism of the Jaina denies the very contention. If reality is held to be absolutely transitory as in Buddhism, the non-absolutism of the Jaina refutes this position also. The Jaina in the denial of the former affirms the latter and vice versa; and he is able to maintain such a position consistently only by resorting to the non-absolute way of thinking. The position held by the Jaina amounts to the contention that a real is a substrate of opposing elements. This brings us face to face with the problem of negation or abhāva which constitutes a vital part of the Anekānta theory of existence. Sankara criticizes the anekānta position of the Jaina as “On account of the impossibility (of contrary attributes) in one and the same thing (the Jaina doctrine) is not (true)."2 It means what is a substrate of opposing elements cannot be one. The Jaina is said to admit the co-presence of opposite elements in a real not with reference to temporal or spatial differences but with reference to the same unitary entity. S. Mookerjee observes: “The central thesis of the Jaina is not only diversity of reals; but each real is equally diversified.”3 Diversity does not connote simple plurality but a plurality which involves opposition; it is a plurality and opposition in one. Samantabhaara remarks: "astitva (position) is concomitant with nāstitva (negation) in the same substrate. 1. Vidyānandin: Aştasahasri, p. 286 2. Brahma-sūtra 2.2. 34 (Translated by Swami Vireswaranand, 2nd ed. 1948) p. 229 3. S. Mookerjee: The Jaina Philosophy of Non-absolutism. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 ... 272