Book Title: Structure and Functions of Soul in Jainism
Author(s): S C Jain
Publisher: Bharatiya Gyanpith

Previous | Next

Page 155
________________ Structure of the Soul and Extension :: 151 modification and is non-eternal, which will strike at the very root of the Law of karma, so that merit will go unrewarded and demerit unpunished." Mainly the criticism is against the soul's capacity for cortradiction and expansion. We should remember that for contraction and expansion subtraction and addition of particles is not the only way, they can take place by a process of interpenetration and mutual extirpation of parts—a theory which the Jaina propounds. The number of pradeśas or the supposed units, in the constitution of a soul, is constant, and the magnitude of the soul varies not by diminution or addition of the pradeśas but by their interpenetration and mutual extirpation. Such a criticism can be justly levelled against the complextheory of the self, because the mental structure endures by an addition or a subtraction of the complexes. This charge against the Jaina theory is not a novel one. Akalarika observes: “If the soul possesses a capacity for contraction and expansion, it becomes impermanent. It is not so, because from the view-point of expansion and contraction as modes generated by the karma-śarīri the soul may be held to be impermanent."3 Again he writes “If on account of parts the soul is held to be mortal, it is not so because the soul does not leave its immaterial nature."* In the process of contraction the pradeśas or the parts of the soul penetrate each other and in expansion the process is reversed. Thus there is no addition to or subtraction from the structure of the soul, and the substance of the soul is perfectly saved. Still there is some change in its modal aspects. The non-absolute philosophy of the Jaina can well maintain, the permanence of the soul's substance through its functional variations. This situation does not present a moral difficulty. If the soul were held absolutely permanent, there would have been no action for moral judgement. If the soul were absolutely impermanent, merit must have gone unrewarded and 1. S.K. Maitra: Fundamentals of Indian Metaphysics and Logic, p. 99 2. Umāsvāti: Tattvārtha-sūtra, 5.8. 3. Akalanka: Rājavārtika, p. 458 4. Ibid., 5.16.4 Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272