Book Title: Structure and Functions of Soul in Jainism
Author(s): S C Jain
Publisher: Bharatiya Gyanpith

Previous | Next

Page 190
________________ 186 Structure and Functions of Soul in Jainism soul, they cannot be held responsible for the limitation of the soul.1 Nor can it be held that the karmas constitute an immaterial substance parallel to the soul. Akalanka objects to such a position, because "an immaterial entity cannot help or hinder the function of another immaterial entity. Just as space does not help or hinder the function of the other categories like the dik (direction), etc., in the same way an immaterial karma cannot help or hinder the function of the immaterial soul." The underlying idea is that, if the adṛṣṭa, the apūrva, the samskāra or the karma is an immaterial principle, it cannot effect limitation and distortion of the soul's powers. Vidyānandin points out that "no karmas are seen to fructify directly or indirectly without the association of matter, so it cannot be held that the karmas are not material." The former argument tries to deny immaterial nature of the karma, while the latter one affirms materiality of the karmas. Yośovijaya also argues that "Materiality of karmas is a correct notion because they effect otherdeterminedness (pāratantrya) of the soul. If it is held due to the soul's capacities, it cannot be effected at all. Necessarily that which is an attribute of something cannot effect its limitation or pāratantrya. Nor can we say that the jiva is not so limited.... The karma is material for the consciousness of pleasure, etc., takes place in its association. That in whose association pleasure etc. are felt is always seen to be material like food, etc. That which is not material is not seen to effect pleasure, etc., by its association like ākāśa or space."4 The Sankhyan position involves a greater inconsistency on account of the absolute immutablity of the self. Das Gupta remarks that "If, again, by the varying states of pleasure and pain the nature of puruşa cannot be affected, then in cannot be regarded as an enjoyer, and if could be 1. Ibid., p. 66 2. Akalanka: Rājavārtika, 8.2.5 3. Yośovijaya: Nyāyāloka, p. 178 4. Yośovijaya: Nyāyāloka, p. 178 Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272