Book Title: Structure and Functions of Soul in Jainism
Author(s): S C Jain
Publisher: Bharatiya Gyanpith

Previous | Next

Page 136
________________ 132 :: Structure and Functions of Soul in Jainism manifestations of the Jiva, they are comprehensible, on the ground of Akalanka's agrument, not only by manaḥparyaya but also by avadhi. All the Jaina writers are unanimous as regards the comprehensibility of the thoughts of others by manaḥparyaya, they differ in holding such a comprehension as direct. If avadhi and manaḥparyaya are concerned only with material substances, we do not know how the problem of the comprehensibility of other's thoughts has come into existence. It is no use saying that the knowledge of other's thoughts is inferred from the knowledge of the substance of the mind, because, then, such a knowledge would be called śrutajñāna. It cannot also be held that the subject-matter of manahparyaya is only the substance of the manas, because it is not the only infinitesimal part of the substance known by avadhi. There is a view that the substance of the manas is comprehensible by avadhi also. It is said that the person possessing avadhi cognizes the mind substances, but the person possessing manahparyaya intution knows the selfsame objects in a more lucid form.' Then it must be held that in the manaḥparyaya alone the comprehensions of the mind-substance rises to a stage where the thoughts of others can be inferred. In the same way Akalanka may be taken to mean that the capacity to comprehend other's thoughts appears only in a soul that has attained telepathy. Avadhi is not capable to comprehend thoughts in others' minds, being a lower type of attainment than manaḥparyaya. From the above discusssion it also follows that avadhi and manaḥparyaya must be held to be distinct types of knowledge. Being the subclasses of direct knowledge they cannot be non-distinct. Just as sensuous knowledge and perceptual knowledge yield two types of experience, though they may comprehend the same object, so also clairvoyance and telepathy, in spite of comprehending the same object, will yield different types of experience. The five types of knowledge have been so devised mainly because the experiences yielded by them are mutually distinct. Their 1. Tatia and Mookerjee: A Critique of the Organ of Knowledge, p. 38 Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272