________________
4.6.2 Dynamisation:
It is expected that dynamisation would enhance the good-energy and reduce the bad-energy of the original sample of a remedy in distilled water. That means,
Eth)>Ed and
Eb(b)<Eb(d)
Similarly, the total energy of a sample should normally increase by dynamisation process (column iv in Table9), say by 20%. Then the above functions can be expressed as:
Eh)=1.2Ed) and Eb(h)=0.8Eb(d)
With this data, the above equation at (iv) can be rewritten as follows:1.2E(d)=Eg(h)+0.8Eb(d).
i.e., Egh)=1.2 Et(d) -0.8 Eb(d) ·
.(v)
and the equation (iii) can be rewritten as
-
E = Et(d) - Eb(d), ·
g(d)
..(vi)
and thus
Egh) becomes >>E
4.7.1
i)
ii)
iii)
g(d)
Following difference in Shah & Mehta's "aura" should be kept in mind.
The total E(A) area (Shah) represents the area of "surrounding aura energy" only and not the energy on the "body" of the object.
Mehta's "good-energy" (Eg) represents the area of good colors (blue, white etc) on the body of the object as well as in the "surrounding aura energy" in his photographs of aura. Mehta's is only qualitative assessment of good-energy.
4.7.2 An attempt has been made to co-relate the Shah's energy area E(A) with the qualitative energy (Eg & Eb) found by Mehta. This may throw some light on the trends. It is obvious that several more experiments with different parameters would be needed before deriving quantitative conclusions about this relationship. At present,
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
