________________
If the good and bad energies do not cancel each other, they would exist together simultaneously, as revealed in Blue and Red colors in the Foto by Dr. Mehta. It is also observed that the graphs of good energy and the scattering of energies run almost parallel, if they are positioned about a neutral axis (Foto 15). It means, if a sample has more good energy (Mehta), it would also exhibit less energy-scattering (shah), as if the sum total of these scalar quantities has to be almost constant, unless extra pranik energy is added by dynamisation. When Ep (pranik) is superimposed on normal water aura area EA, its scattering is reduced in proportion to the intensity of Ep. Thus the density of aura energy goes on increasing and the entropy goes on decreasing by dynamisation. Since the data of Mehta is not quantifiable, it is considered to be only an assessment of the 'Trend'. Table 5 of previous article has now been modified as per this analytical conclusion in new Table 5M, given here.
10
TABLE 5M: Probable relative magnitude of aura of different constituents of water (Assessed): S.N. Component Aura TL TF* BD* XXX ELi
14 14
| 1612 12 E Mi
111
1606 0 E d/p
0 0-1 E o/r (-ve) -6 -11 0
-2
0 E Tr 2 0 0 1
0 0 6/Sum E A (SHAH)
| 21.5
| 14-15 17.5 10* | 18.5 14.5 7. Energy Density (De*) 1
0.9
1.3 8. E A (Mehta)*
16
46
4.
5.
21
24
*Predicted figures. Further experiments are needed with sophisticated equipments to quantify these deductive statements. For the aforesaid data, following equations should hold good (Mehta):(i) E. = Eg + E. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... (ii) --- i.e., Total energy of a
water sample. (ii) E..)=E() + Exa) ........ ............ (iii) --- for distilled water (iii) E..) =Egch) +EbO) ..................(iv) --- for dynamised water.
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
