Book Title: Jaina Concept of Omniscience
Author(s): Ramjee Singh
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 108
________________ PROOFS FOR THE SOUL BEING.. 95 But there are difficulties in this position. Is the self a mere empirical collection identical with five-fold aggregates of physical and psychical states? In other words, is the self identical with body and mind? If so, there would be no self after death. This will lead to materialism or nihilism (ucchedavāda) and will also make moral and spiritual progress lead. ing to Nirvāṇa meaningless. True, to questions like these, the usual Buddhist answer is that the relationship is indescribable (avacya).1 108 But then, this is not really an answer. However, on behalf of the Buddhist, it can be said that Buddha adopted a neither-nor approach quite characteristic of the doctrine of the middle path (Madhyama Pratipada) i.e, he thought that soul is neither different from nor identical with the body,10. in order to get rid of both eternalism (Śāśvatavāda) and nihilism (Ucchedavāda). The second difficulty in the Buddhist view of Self is that it misses the sense of identity. It is true that the theory of a mind -continuum governed by the natural law of causation provides not only for continuity, but also for change. Each succeeding state is the result of the preceding state which means that nothing is lost. Now if the doctrine of Karma means an assertion of the inexorable moral law of causation, and rebirth implies not the physical continuity of the body but the emergence of a new series of states caused and conditioned by the preceding ones, then Buddhists say, they have no difficulty in accepting them. Similarly, memory also becomes expicable. Vasubandhu says "Memory is a new state of consciousness directed to the same 103 Nagarjuna observes: "There is the self, there is the not-self, as also that there is neither the self nor the not-self"-Madhyamika Kārikā, XVIII. 6. 104 Samyutta Nikaya, XII. 35.5; Majjhima Nikaya, I. 256. cp. "Eternalism implies inherent perfection while nihilism implies its impossibility. It is in order to avoid these two undesired consequences that the Buddha adopted the middle course and left these problems avyakata unexplained" N. M. Tatia, Studies in Jaina Philosophy, p. 14. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258