Book Title: Jaina Concept of Omniscience
Author(s): Ramjee Singh
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

Previous | Next

Page 205
________________ MIMAMSAKAS' OBJECTIONS ANSWERED virodhi), or statement supported by pramāņas (pramāṇa-sangata) or like an ordinary person who makes all sorts of statements (samanya). If the first alternative is true, then in using it as the hetu, one commits fallacy of unproved reason (asiddha) because it has not been proved that the omniscient makes statements unsupported by the pramanas; rather the opposite is true because there can be no false instructions given by the omniscient. If the second alternative is true, then it will lead to the fallacy of contradictory (viruddha) ketu, since such speaker (who makes only such statement as supported by the pramāņas) must be omniscient being; and if we accept the last alternative, it will lead to the fallacy of irregular middle (anaikantika) because in that case both omniscience and non-omniscience will be established depending upon the statements made by the ordinary speaker.79 192 (b) Prabhācandra's argument against using 'speakership' as the hetu for establishing the non-existence of cmniscience is also very similar to the above. According to him, such a speaker may be either meaningful (arthasya vaktṛtvam) or unmeaningful (artha-rahitasya vaktṛatvam) or ordinary (sāmānya). If the speaker is accepted as meaningful, it becomes against the reason (viruddha) because one who will speak only meaningful things will naturally be an omniscient being; if the second alternative is accepted, it proves the proposition (siddha-sādhana) since the Jainas also do not admit the unmeaningful speaker as omniscient being; if the speaker is regarded as ordinary (sāmānya), the Jainas have no opposition to it. If at all there might be any opposition, it might be either all-time opposition (sahānavasthāna-virodha) like enemity between the serpent and goose or mutually exclusive opposition (paraspara-parihāralakṣaṇa-virodha). It cannot be the first type of opposition, since the omniscient being also imparts instructions e.g. they are speakers. If the second alternative e.g. the opposition be 79 Ibid., cp. Anantavirya, Ibid., pp. 92-93; Prabhācandra, Prameyakamala-martanda, p. 263; V. R. Suri, Ibid., Vol. VII, p. 570, Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258