Book Title: Jaina Concept of Omniscience
Author(s): Ramjee Singh
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 131
________________ 118 KARMA : THE MATERIAL BASIS.. existence and consequent relativity of cause and effect, bondage and liberation, the Jainas like many other Indian scholars say, we can do no better than assert that relationship between nescience and self has to be postulated as beginningless. We can discuss only the 'how of the soul's bondage and not the 'why' of it. For nescience, the Jainas use the term mithyātva. It means perversity of outlook. It leads one to wrong-perception, he perceives non-soul as the soul, irreligion as religion, wrong way as the right way, etc. Different authors have presented different divisions and sub-divisions of mithyātva. 6° Mithyātva is at the root of all evils and is also the cause of wordly existence. Jainas like others do not question further whence and why of nescience (mithyātva). But though nescience is beginningless, it is not endless. The Jainas say that as the luminousity of the sun is obscured by clouds, fog, etc., SO the all-knowing nature of the self is obscured by the faithand knowledge-obscuring karmas. And, just as the sun shines in its full splendour when the cloud is removed, so the self emerges as all-knowing when the veil of karma is lifted by the practice of prescribed methods. The analogy of sun and cloud has further been utilised to point out the degrees of knowledge and status of souls. As there is some light left even when the sun is covered with a very dark cloud, so fragment of pure knowledge remains in the soul;01 it dues possess partial knowledge in forms of mali, śruta etc. Hence the distinction between all-obscuring (sarva-ghātin) and partial 60. Unāsvami (Tat-sūt., VIII. 1.) and Siddhasena Gani (Tat-süt-Vr., VIII.1.) divide mith yātva into two kinds, firm (abhigrahita) and notfirm (anabhigrahita); Pūjyapada (Sarvārtha-siddhi, VIII.1.) also gives iwo forms - inborn (naisargika) and acquired (paro padeśa pārvak 1) the latter again sub-divided into four sub-classes; Kundakunda (Samayasāra, 89) presents a three-fold division into wrong-faith (mith yātva), wrong-knowledge (a jñāna) and wrong-conduct (avirati); Devendra Sūri (Ka.Gr. IV. 50) gives five-fold division of it. 61 Nandi-Sutra, 42. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258