Book Title: Anusandhan 2010 03 SrNo 50 2
Author(s): Shilchandrasuri
Publisher: Kalikal Sarvagya Shri Hemchandracharya Navam Janmashatabdi Smruti Sanskar Shikshannidhi Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 190
________________ मार्च २०१० १८३ neither-true-nor-false, and therefore permissible. It must be assumed that only the use of strategically ambiguous messages for the purpose of creating vairāgya-shocks is seen as legitimate, but not language which creates doubt about Jainism in the minds of believers. He seems to follow Malayagiri (PaņņT), who argued that from the niscaya-naya not only satya-mrsā but also asatya-mrsā statements are false-'if they are spoken with the intention of deceiving others' (MĀLVANIYĀ 1971: 346). However, Viy 18.7.1 (749a) states that, by definition, the speech of a Kevalin, because it is harmless, can only be true or neither-true-nor false.73 The statement associates higher moral truth with this type of speech, which can thus be compared with the 'twilight-language' (sandhā-bhāsā) of Tantric Buddhism, which is also characterised as neither-true-nor-false. 74 Jambūvijaya's edition of the Thāņa 4.23 (238) contains the following commentary of According to OKUDA (1975: 129), MĀC 119 explains samsaya-vayaņi <samsaya-vacana> as ‘speech which expresses doubt'. But its commentator Vasunandin (11th-12th century) interprets this as “speech of children and old people as well as the sounds of (five-sensed) ‘roaring buffalos' etc., which cause doubt as to their meaning, while the Digambara authors Aparājita and Āsādhara and the Śvetâmbara Haribhadra commenting on DVS 7, read samsayakaraņi simply as “ambiguous speech' (anekârtha-sādhāraņā). Haribhadra classifies speech of children asaņakkhara <anakşara>, incomprehensible, which also figures as the ninth and last category listed in MĀc 119, which Vasunandin reserves for expressions of animals of two-four senses, and for sounds created by snipping fingers etc. (OKUDA 1975: 129).75 Vyākītā bhāṣā refers to clear distinct speech with explicit unambiguous meaning (RATNACANDRA 1988 IV: 511).76 There is no example given by the commentaries for distinct speech which is neither-true-nor-untrue. Avyākstā-bhāsa), refers to indistinct involuted or poetic specch consisting of obscure Jain Education International 2010_03 For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270