Book Title: Jaina Gazette 1914
Author(s): J L Jaini, Ajitprasad
Publisher: Jaina Gazettee Office

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 187
________________ 262 JAINA GAZETTE. (Aug. & Sept. this kind of logic, so much the better for the faith of early days. And so far from acknowledging it to be “obviously true," I should agree with most of the plain man' type that I have met that nothing can be more obviously false. And the 'plain man' would not dream of arguing, that because his system of thinking compelled him to regard an organism as a reality rather than a phantom, therefore, he was compelled to make an addition sam amounting to two, of the content of the whole plus the whole. He would rather say the one whole includes its component elements and thus remains one. Even in such a whole as a wall, if it is to be true to the notion of a good wall, the whole re-acts on thie parts, in the sense of determining what shall be the nature of the parts and that an identity of quality and co-operative function runs through them. The principle of the whole is present in each of the parts. This is. even more manifest in a whole of differentiated parts, like a work of art or an organism, where the co-operating nature and single parpose exhibit the identity in and through the different members which constitute the whole ; and is still more obvious in a spiritual wbolea living mind, whose members are so intimately related that one finds even the organic relation an inadequate conception. And surely one has only to state that the matter or content: has to be re-acted upon or transfigured ere it can enter into the constitution of such a whole, to render the relation part to wholo inescapable. Reinove a limb from a living organism and it is no longer a limb, in the essential meaning of an organ capable of functioning in its distinctive way. One can distinguish the parts within a whole, but to separate a part from a whole, in other words, cancel its relation to the whole, is to forthwith deprive it of its claim to or attribute of partness. It no longer contributes to the wholeness, and the whole is not the saine whole after it has been removed, but one of smaller magnitude and contracted efficiency. Even your bag of marbles, from whish you have removed part of its content, is 1sot the identioal whole that it was before the reduction : and the marble you bavo removed, though still a Shree Sudharmaswami Gyanbhandar-Umara, Surat www.umaragyanbhandar.com

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332