Book Title: Jaina Gazette 1914
Author(s): J L Jaini, Ajitprasad
Publisher: Jaina Gazettee Office

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 190
________________ 1914.] JAINA GAZETTE. 265 In the first place, allow me to say that I have not studied any treatise on universals and particulars though these are not entirely unknown to me nor unthought about, and if yon will recommend any book of study in this respect or act as teacher, I shall only be too willing to listen and learn. And if there is any fault with my own views I do not want to defend it, but to mend it. Before proceeding to reply to your attack upon my propositions with regard to whole and part, let me bring to mind the bearing that these propositions have, or we may be in danger of wandering too far afield, or of discussing something that does not much matter after all. It is the individual that matters. Philosophy must supply reasons for believing each individual to be an individual, a permanent one, immortal. This perhaps is the hook to which the chain of arguments is attached; one of the links is the problem whether or not (as above stated) the individuals in the world, you, I, the cat, etc., constitute a Universal Self. And thus has arisen the discussion about whole and part, and it is only those aspects of the subject that bear upon the permanence of the individual that matter perhaps. What sort of a whole can an individual be part of? Is the whole of which an individual can be a part the same kind of whole that an individual is? No. With this introduction, I will proceed to reply to your attack upon the propositions about the parts of a given whole being related to that whole, and about a given whole being the sum of its parts. (And here, I think, I may say that I do not think the point I mentioned has been perceived, so that your attack is perhaps a refutation of something I never meant at all.) Therefore, I should, before dealing with the main topic of the permanence of an individual, like to get my idea perceived about whole and part, and, being perceived, acknowledged to be true. I will try to repeat what I mean about the incorrectness of speech when we speak of a part being related to a whole of which it is a part. In order to speak correctly I ought to say Shree Sudharmaswami Gyanbhandar-Umara, Surat www.umaragyanbhandar.com

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332