Book Title: Introduction to Jainism and its Culture
Author(s): Balbhadra Jain
Publisher: Kundkund Gyanpith Indore

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 64
________________ Buddhism does not believe in some eternal and non-regressive entity. This school believes in the ephemeral. The preceding moment transfers its attributes to the following moment and gets destroyed. This is pain or passion. Even for a moment a thing cannot remain stable in one state with one attitude. This world is nothing but continuous transformation. As against this Vedānta believes that transformation is non-existent therefore illusion. This visible world is false only Brahma is truth. It is fundamentally eternal. The assimilation of these two contradicting schools having absolutistic belief in the impermanent and permanent nature of the world is Syādvāda. It accepts both the theories as partial truths and propounds that the fundamental form of a thing is permanent, it is never destroyed. From this point of view a thing or entity is permanent. But with reference to its modes and variants it undergoes change every moment. From this point of view it is impermanent. The permanence and impermanence of a thing is relative. Its eternal or ephemeral nature is not the absolute truth. Syādvāda presents assimilative solutions to all philosophical debates in this form. The Jain ācāryas say that nayas (reference points) cover all the philosophies because much like nayas these philosophies accept only one specific form of a thing. For example – Buddhism may be called correct according to Řjusutra naya, Vedānta according to Samgraha naya, Nyāya and Vaiseșika according to Naigama naya, the Shabda-Brahma school according to Shabda naya, and Cārvāka according to Vyavahāra naya. But this is possible only when they are accepted as relative and not absolute. Syādvāda is a humble effort to explore and recognize parts of truth in all religions and philosophies. Of course, it criticizes the arbitrary prejudices in favour of their own beliefs, but it promotes compromise between mutually contradicting philosophical concepts. It proves its usefulness in the field of philosophy due to this assimilative approach. Had every philosophy accepted Syādvāda would there be any philosophical dispute left unresolved? 47 Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334