________________
Parināma in Tarka-period
147
in the ‘agurulaghu' quality of Dharma, Adharma and Akāśa-all these represent Aparispandātmaka-pariņāma. Kriya, however, is distinguished from this kind of Pariņāma and is called Parispandātmikā though Parispanda is not defined. 87
Akalamka refutes the view that like 'sthiti' (staticity), kriyā too gets included under Parinama. He points out that a substance (dravya) possesses two bhavas (states)-Parispandātmaka and Aparispandātmaka; to indicate the former, the term kriyā is employed and to indicate the latter the term pariņāma is employed as
Vidyānanda points out that only that paryāya or pariņama of a Dravya which is the cause of the attainment of another place is to be called Kriya and not all.To At another place he includes both Parispanda and Pariņāma under kriyā.30
Siddhasena, the commentator of the Tsū. and its bhāsya, at one place, states that the change in a substance (dravya) without abandoning its essential nature is pariņāma; and hence pariņāma does not include in its fold parispanda, i. e., kriya,31 while at another place he states that kriyā is a particular kind of pariņāma.32 This suggests that he is not opposed to the view that includes kriyā under the head of pariņāma.
Thus, Pūjyapāda and Akalamka distinguish between Kriyā and Pariņāma by defining the former as Parispandātmikā (i. e. movement in space) and the latter as internal change of qualities
27 Sarvärtha-siddhi on V. 22 28 RājV p. 227 29 OPEL FE agradariaeg: quft: fet, 7 fra
ŚI. V. p. 357–398 30 qfE9rG274091 FFTTT...... qfUTASTATUTAT $201...1
Sl. V. p. 398, See also ASS p. 178 31 Fahrrafata ofertraCETATTURUFTÈCHTA: affitta.....
commentary, p. 350 32 fafaragiar ga aiaf ar afa i Ibid, p. 353
