________________
Pariņāma in Tarka-Period
153
artificial Pariņāma because it depends upon human effort. 50
Siddhasena, the commentator of the Tsū and its bhāşya, while commenting on the Tsū. V. 22 gives Prayoga, Visrasā and Miśra as the varieties of 'gati' or 'kriyā. 4 0 It must be noted that he does not refer to those varietes viz., Samudāyakşta, Aikatvika etc., which he discusses in his tīkä on the Tsū. V. 29.
From the above, it can be seen that while Siddhasena Divā. kara, Abhayadeva, and Siddhasena the commentator of the Tsū. and its bhāşya, apply the two types of Pariņāma, Prayoga and Visrasă, chiefly to changes of Pudgala, Dharma, Adharma, and Akāśa i. e. to Ajiva substances only, Akalamka and Vidyānanda .extend them to Jįva also.
The above analysis of Pariņāma into Prayoga and Visrasa is an attempt to explain two types of causation, one natural and the other invloving human agency. This obviates, for the Jain, the necessity of postulating a Creator, because he is able to explain all the happenings in the universe by these two types of Pariņāmas.
(4) Artha-Paryāya and Vyañjana-Paryāya
The distinction or analysis of Paryāya into Artha--Paryāya and Vyañjana-Paryaya is to be found for the first time in the Sanmati-Tarka of Siddhasena Divakara.
39 धर्मास्तिकायादिद्रव्यस्य तु वैससिकोऽसंख्येयप्रदेशित्वादिरनादिः परिणामः
प्रतिनियतगत्युपग्रहहेतुत्वादिः । आदिमान् प्रयोगजो यंत्रादिगत्युपग्रहहेतुत्वादिः
gauitara I SI. V. on V. 22 .40 तत्र प्रयोगगति: जीवपरिणामसंप्रयुक्त्ता शरीराहारवर्णगन्धरसस्पर्शसंस्था
नविषया, विस्रसागतिः प्रयोगमन्तरेण केवलाजीवद्रव्यस्वपरिणामरूपा, परHỊU VÌgaFT: fagifi fafiqade I ...... | P. 353
