Book Title: Sramana 2008 04
Author(s): Shreeprakash Pandey, Vijay Kumar
Publisher: Parshvanath Vidhyashram Varanasi

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 187
________________ 182 1: Śramaņa, Vol 59, No. 2/April-June 2008 and Mulagana are synonymous; therefore, Mulasamgha is actually the earlier name of the Yapaniya-Samgha. In due course, when the Yapaniya-Samgha was merged into the Nirgrantha Digambara tradition, the Digambara and Mūlasamgha became synonymous. Bhagavatī Ārādhanā by Śivārya is also a work of the Yapaniya tradition, as its comrnentator Aparajitasūri was undoubtedly an Yapaniya. Even the Digambara origin of Vaddha-ārādhanā and another ārādhanā also does not prove that the original work was of Digambara origin. Many Śvetambara masters such as Haribhadra, Yasovijaya, etc. cannot be Digambara or Bauddha just because they have written commentaries on many Digambara and Buddhist works. The place of honour that Siddhasena Divakara has gained in the Digambara tradition is only because of the qualitative merit of his work. In my book, Jaina Dharma Kā Yāpanīya Sampradāya', I have clearly proved that Siddhasena Divakara, the author of 'Sanmatitarka' was the predecessor of the Śvetāmbara and Yāpanīya traditions. It is surprising that a serious scholar of History like Dr. Nagarajaiah has written that Abhayadeva, the commentator of Sanmatitarka was a Digambara. In the commentary itself Abhayadeva has mentioned himself as a disciple of Pradyumnasūri of Candragaccha. Not only this, in the last colophon of the Pārsvanatha-carita, he has been mentioned as Svetambara grāmanīya. Dr. Nagarajaiah contention that Siddhasena and Jaṭāsimhanandi were Neo-Digambaras is not logical. Siddhasena was a ācārya prior to the sectarian division and Jațasimhanandi was clearly an Yapaniya. The belief that all the ācāryas having 'sena' in his names are from the Sena sect is also not true. In all the three traditions - Digambara, Śvetāmbara and Yāpaniya - there have been a number of ācāryas whose names ended with the suffix 'sena! Therefore, it is not proper to call all ācāryas with the ending suffix 'sena' as Neo-Digambaras. A sect by the name of Neo-Digambara never existed. If there ever has been any sect working as a bridge between Digambara and For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org Jain Education International

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236