________________
Vada ] Nihnavavāda
:318: टीका-४२-४३ । व्याख्याउत्तमतिसंहननाः पूर्ववेदिनो जघन्यतोऽपि किञ्चिन्यूननवपूर्वपाठका इत्यर्थः सर्वदेव निरुपमशक्त्याधतिशयसंपमा जिनकल्पिका अपि “तवेण सुत्तेण सत्तेण" इत्यादि पूर्वोक्तविधिना कृतपरिकमाण एव जिनकल्पं प्रतिपद्यन्ते, नान्यथेति न रथ्यापुरुषकल्पानां भवादृशां जिनकल्पस्तीर्थकरैरनुज्ञात इति । तत् तस्माद् यदि जिनवचनादर्हदुपदेशान्जिनकल्पं प्रतिपद्यसे त्वम्, ततस्तहिं "स जिनकल्पो व्यवच्छिन्नः" इतीदमपि प्रतिपद्यख । अथैतद् न प्रतिपद्यसे, तहिं “जिनकल्पोऽस्ति" इति कथं तीर्थकरवचनं तव प्रमाणम् ? । कथं च "व्यवच्छिन्नोऽसौ" इति न प्रमाणम् ? । नन्वाग्रहपिशाचिकाग्रस्तचेष्टितमिदम् ? स्वेच्छामात्रप्रवृत्तत्वादिति ॥२५९१॥२५९२॥
D. C. Jinakalpikas, who possess the virtuous qualities like excellent fortitude and bodily constitution, who are conversent with Nine Pūrvas, and who possess excellent qualities, and who have also undergone the usual five tests, always admit the validity of Jinakalpa. The Tirthankaras have allowed the practice of Jinakalpa for such worthy persons, and not for unworthy persons like you. If you, therefore, believe in Jinakalpa, you should also admit the same to have already perished. For, otherwise, how could the words of the Tirthankaras laying down that Jinakalpa existed, be authentic to you? And, how could the view that it has not perished, bę authentic on the other hand ?
Śivabhati :-Existence of Jinakalpa has already been admitted in the āgamas, but by which pramāņa (authoritative statement) is the destruction of Jinakalpa laid down by the Tirthankara? 42-43 (2591-2592).
The Acārya replies :मण-परमोहि-पुलाए-आहारग-खवग-उवसमे-कप्पे । संयमतिय-केवल-सिज्मणा य जंबुम्मि बुच्छिण्णा ॥४४॥२५९३॥ 44. Maņa-Paramohi-Pulād-Abāraga-Kbavaga-Uvasamd-Rappel
Samyamatiya-Kdvala-Sijjhaņā ya Jambummi vucchiņņā. (2593) [मन:-परमावधि-पुलाका-आहारक-क्षपको-पशमा:-कल्पः । संयमत्रिक-केवल-सिद्धयश्च जम्बो व्युच्छिन्नाः ॥४४॥२५९३॥
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
