Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 01
Author(s): Jas Burgess
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 422
________________ JAINA INSCRIPTIONS FROM MATHURA. - 1. नम घर [स] तममहरणस्थ' विसरेन] मम । दिविस २ - गणे अयंचेटिये कुले हरीतमालकढिय [श]ाख नागसेणस्य नि B. [at] yau[t]' [स्] हगिनंदिन " शिसो ग ——— A. 1. No. IX.1 —— No. X.12 I. 1. सिद्धम् सं ४० ५ व [२] दि १० [७] एतस्य पुर्व्व [1]य - TRANSLATION. Hail! Adoration! In the year 44 of the most illustrious (?) great king Huviksha," in the third month of summer, on the second day. On that [date specified as] above, at the request of the (eenerable) Nagasena, the pupil of Haginamdi (Bhaganandi?), a preacher (ráchka) in the [Fárapa] goma, in the Aryya-Chetiya (Arya-Chetika) kala, in the Harita malakaḍhi (Haritamalagadhi) sákká... No. XI.1 - ४०" - हे - दि १० [] य वरयतो ग[] 387 TRANSLATION. Success! In the year 45, in the third (?) (month of) the rainy season, on the seventeenth (?) day, -on the (date specified as) above... by the daughter-inlaw of Buddhi, the . . . of Dharmavṛiddhi ... 1. [] C. 1. तो भार्य्यहटिकियतो कुलतो D. 1. [] x[1]w[t]w[Y] fw[fr]xx[t] चिक ....... gfe" aya wiefce - य Incised on the simhasana or pedestal of a large seated Jina (head lost),-3 feet 5 inches by 2 feet 10 inches; found at the same place. In the plates of facsimiles No. xxxii is a duplicate, to a larger scale and from a different impression, of the second line of this inscription. The first sign might also be read T. The second is very distinct, but not a complete letter, as it consists of a semicircle, open to the left, with a horizontal stroke in the middle. I am inclined to believe that the whole is intended for fer नमी शिरिमत्तममहाराजल. 3 B2 The figure 4 has no cross-bar in the vertical stroke. T probably stands for. I cannot explain. In No. XXIV we have t 7 Restore qet qatat r, the latter according to No. XI. The right side of the last letter is slightly damaged. * Restore शायार्या; वाचकस्य looks here like बाचकी, but the reading is certain in the facsimile marked No. 32. 10 Possibly for; at the end one would expect fe. Compare the facsimile No. 32. "The form Huviksha may be due either to a negligent mode of spelling or to a faulty pronunciation. Incised on the pedestal of a small squatted Jina (head lost), 2 feet 7 inches by 2 feet 2 inches; from the same place. 13 The signs of the date are blurred, but with the exception of the bracketted ones not doubtful. 14 Some indistinct signs are visible before agfre. "Regarding the meaning of Vadku, daughter-in-law, compare Nos. II, IV, V. 15 Incised on the four faces (4, B, C, D) of the pedestal of a quadruple image consisting of four erect naked standing Jinas, placed back to back as usual; stone 2 feet 8 inches by 1 foot, found in the same locality. Preservation apparently not good. Restore fe. Aecond figure seems to have stood after the plain .

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528