Book Title: Tribes In Ancient India
Author(s): Bimla Charn Law
Publisher: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute

Previous | Next

Page 114
________________ CHAPTER XXIV THE AMBAŞTHAS The Ambasthas 1 as a tribe existed at least as early as the time of the Aitareya Brāhmana, when they were probably settled in the Punjab; and they can be traced up to the present day in parts of Bengal and Bihar, whither they migrated in later times. In the Aitareya Brāhmana (VIII, 21-3), King Ambasthya (= 'of Ambaştha') is mentioned as having been consecrated with the Aindra Mahābhiseka along with nine other kings. The Mahābhārata 2 mentions the Ambasthas along with the Sivis, Kșudrakas, Mālavas and other north-western tribes. In the Bhīşma (Chap. 20, 10) and Drona (Chap. 119, 14) Parvans, the Ambasthas are referred to as having taken part in the Kuruksetra war, on the side of the Kurus; while in the Karnaparvan,3 Srutāyuh, the valiant Ksatriya, who was killed by Arjuna, is described as a king of the Ambaşthas. The Ambaşthas were also once defeated by Nakula, the fourth Pāņdava, along with the Sivis, Trigarttas and Mālavas 4; and Śrutāyuh was among those who did homage to Yudhisthira after the defeat.5 In the Purāņas, the Ambasthas are represented as Anava Ksatriyas, and are said to have originated from Suvrata, son of Uśīnara; they were thus intimately related to the Vaudheyas and the Sivis, 6 and were settled on the eastern border of the Punjab.? The country is mentioned in the Bārhaspatya Arthaśāstra,8 where it is associated with Sind (Kāśmīra-Hūna-Ambastha-Sindhavah); while the tribe is included in the list derived by Colonel Wilford from the Varāha Samhitā. The Purāṇas seem to represent the Ambasthas as Ksatriyas, descended as they were from Usinara; and, as we have seen, the Mahābhārata refers to their King Śrutāyuh as 'the best of Ksatriyas'. But the evidence of Smrti literature seems to point to their mixed origin. According to the Gautama-Dharmasūtra (IV, 16), children born of wives of the next, second or third lower castes become 1 According to Goldstücker, the older denomination of the tribe was probably Ambastha, not Ambastha. 2 II, 52, 14-15. 3 Chap. 5, 18. 4 Sabhāparvan, Chap. 32, 7. 5 Ibid., Chap. 52, 14-15. 6 Pargiter, Ancient Indian Historical Tradition, p. 109. 7 Ibid., p. 264. 8 Ed. F. W. Thomas, p. 21. 9 Asiatic Researches, Vol. VIII, pp. 344, 346.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449