Book Title: Tribes In Ancient India
Author(s): Bimla Charn Law
Publisher: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute

Previous | Next

Page 305
________________ THE PRĀGJYOTIŞAS 285 According to the Mahābhārata, Prāgjyotisa was situated in the northern region of India; but the Mārkandeya Purāna places it in the eastern region, together with the Brahmottaras (or Suhmottaras), Pravijayas (perhaps Prāvệseyas), Bhārgavas, Jñeyamallakas, Madras, Videhas, Tāmraliptakas, Mallas and Magadhas; or together with the Candreśvaras, Khaśas, Magadhas, and Lauhityas.2 The mountainous regions called Antar-giri, Vahirgiri, and Upa-giri in the Mahābhārata 3 appear to comprise the lower slopes of the Himalayas and the Nepalese Terai; and it is not unlikely that the Prāgjyotişas lived contiguously, as Bhagadatta is called Sailālaya ('one whose abode is in the mountains ').4 According to the Abhidhānacintāmani, Prāgjyotisa was the same as Kāmarūpa, though in the Raghuvamśa the Prāgjyotisas and Kāmarūpas are described as two different peoples. Generally speaking, the two countries came in later times to be regarded as one and the same. In the Kālikāpurāna, for example, the capital of Kāmarūpa is called Prāgjyotişapura, which has been identified with Kāmākhyā or Gauhāti. The Raghuvamśa seems to locate Prāgjyotisa beyond the Brahmaputra,? but Kālidāsa's knowledge of distant geographical locations is not always satisfactory. For all practical purposes, Prāgjyotişa may, therefore, be identified with the whole of Assam proper, along with Northern Bengal as far as Rungpur and Cooch Behar, which is the territory comprised by Kāmarūpa, according to the Yoginītantra. King Bhagadatta, as we have seen, was a Mleccha, and his people also Mlecchas or Yavanas, i.e. non-Aryans, but the Rāmāyana ascribes the foundation of the kingdom to Amūrtarājas, one of the four great sons of King Kuśa-a significant Aryan name. According to the Brahmāndapurāna and the Rāmāyaṇa, there seems to have been another Prāgjyotişapura on the river Vetravati or Betwa. The later kings of Kāmarūpa, who claimed to have been descended from the line of Narakāsura and Bhagadatta, figured prominently in Indian history. Most important of them was Kumāra Bhāskaravarman, an ally of Harsavardhana Silāditya, and referred to both by Bāņa (in his Harşacarita) and by Hsuan Tsang, the celebrated Chinese pilgrim. 1 Sabhāparvan, XXV, 1000; Vanaparvan, CCLII, 15240-2. 2 Pargiter's Ed., pp. 327-30, 357. 3 Sabhāparvan, XXV, 1000—XXVI, 1012. 4 Striparvan, XXIII, 644. 5 Prāgjyotişah Kāmarūpah, IV, 22. The name Kāmarūpa seems to have come into use later. 8 Chap. 38. 7 IV, 81. 8 Imp. Gaz. India, XIV, p. 331. o Brahmāndapurāņa, Chap. 27; Rāmāyaṇa, Kişkindhyā Kānda, Chap. 42.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449