Book Title: Tribes In Ancient India
Author(s): Bimla Charn Law
Publisher: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute

Previous | Next

Page 211
________________ CHAPTER XLV KERALAS OR CHERAS The Keralaputra (Ketalaputra or Chera) is the country south of Kūpaka (or Satya), extending down to Kanneti in Central Travancore (Karunagapalli Taluk). South of it lay the political division of Mūshika'. It was watered by the river Periyār on the banks of which stood its capital Vañji (near Cochin) and at its mouth the seaport of Muziris (Kranganur). According to L. D. Barnett 2 the Chera or Kerala territory comprised Travancore, Cochin and the Malabar District; the Kongu-deśa (corresponding to the Coimbatore District and the southern part of Salem District), which at one time was separate from it and later annexed to it. Its capital was originally Vañji (now Tiru-Karūr, on the Periyār river, near Cochin), but later Tiru-Vañjikkalam (near the mouth of the Periyār). It had important trading centres on the western coast at Tondi on the Agalappulai, about five miles north of Quilāndi, Muchiri (near the mouth of the Periyār), Paļaiyur (near Chowghāt), and Vaikkarai (close to Kottayam). The three Tamil kingdoms, viz. Cāļa, Chera and Pāņdya, are vaguely mentioned in the Sanskrit Epics and Purāṇas. Thus in the Purāņas, as Sir R. G. Bhandarkar points out,' the term Dakṣiṇāpatha or Daksina is used to denote the whole peninsula to the south of the Narmadā. The Mārkandeya Purāņa (Chap. 57, 45) reads Kevalas. The Vāyupurāna (XLV, 124) and the Matsyapurāna (CXIII, 46) as well as the Bhīşmaparvan of the Mahābhārata (IX, 352 and 365) give the correct reading Kerala: According to the Mahābhārata, 4 the Keralas seem to have been a forest tribe. In historical times they are associated with the Colas and Pandyas. This is upheld by Harivamśa as well (XXXII, 1836). The Mārkandeya, Vāyu and Matsya Purānas mention the Cõļas, Pāņdyas and Keralas among the peoples of the Dakşiņāpatha. In the Mārkandeya Purāņa,5 the reading of the second line, as R. G. Bhandarkar says, is wrong. He gives his reading as follows: 'Pāņdyāśca Keralāścaiva Colah Kulyās tathaiva ca'. In the Rāmāyana, we read that Sugrīva, the 1 Political History of Ancient India, 4th Ed., p. 273. 2 Cambridge History of India, Vol. I, p. 595. 3 Early History of the Dekkan, p. I. 4 Sabhāparvan, XXX, pp. 1174-5. 5 Chap. 57, 45 (ed. Bibliotheca Indica). 13 6 IV, Chap. 41, Bom. Ed.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449