Study of Tattvarthasutra with Bhasya

Author(s): Suzuko Ohira
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

Page 84

Sec. 2. REFERENCES TO THE T.S. IN THE AGMIC COMMENTARIES UP TO THE 10TH A. D.
T. S. actually possessed in influencing the later thoughts. The deficiency of this section is hoped to be suplemented in the next section wherein some controversial aphorisms evinced in this survey are going to be independently discussed with further. penetration along with some other problems involved with the T.S.
The following table indicates the references to or the citations from the T. S. recorded in the examined works. Those texts which do not display any as such are not herein reckoned. The sequence of these works roughly follows the chronological order, however the relative chronology of the various Prakirṇakas may fall later. Some works of unknown authors which are ascribed to certain authors by some or by traditien are grouped under the ascribed authors. Many of the niryukti gathās and bhaya gaths are indistinguishably mixed in the cases of the Bhatkalpa and Vyavahara. In this table, the chapter and aphorism of the T. S. referred to are indicated first, which is followed by a citation made in the examined text by indicating gatha number or page number, when a citation is made by the word iti, uktam, etc., it is marked by a single asterisk; in case a quotation is made by the title work, i. e., T. S., it is marked by double asterisks.
PRAKIRNAKAS (after the 6th century A.D.)
Maranasamadhi
71
Sütrakta
1:1
NIRYUKTIS
Bhadrabahu (the later 5th century A.D.)
Avasyaka (based on Avasyakasütra-niryukter-avacārnih)
1:1
1:31 Bh.
IX:27
I:1
NIRYUKTIS
Ascribed to Bhadrabahu
Pinda
1:1
Ogha
I:1
BHASYAS
Sanghadasa
15
Bhatkalpa
I:1
910, 1082
979
1477ff.
112
69-70
740
1323