Book Title: Studies in Jainology Prakrit Literature and Languages
Author(s): B K Khadabadi
Publisher: Prakrit Bharti Academy

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 21
________________ Studies in Jainology, Prakrit Now from the life of Buddha and the Pali canon, we learn that Buddha and Mahavira, departing from the instructional path of the Vedic priestly class, practised their preaching and teaching in thc language of the common people almost in the same region and in the same period. Hence naturally the modium of instruction of both of them was more or less the same." But the Pali canon tells us that Buddha's medium of teaching was Māgadhi. How to account for this anomaly? It is in the fitness of things and just natural that Mahāvīra and Buddha preached and taught the masses more or less in the same leading popular language of Magadha which accomodated different features of other dialects spoken in the area of their religious activities. And this accomodative leading popular language had its hold on the hall of Magadha area, 18 with Rajagrha as the representing centre, and hence, the name Ardhamagadhi might have been current, among the Ganadharas and the community of 14,000 recluses following Mahavira, in his life time itsell, or a little later; and further it might have been passed on to the redacted canon and from there to other later scholars who might have had one cyc on the tradition too. As regards the second half of the problem, viz., is the Ardhamagadhi, the language of the present canon, the same as the Ardhamāgadhĩ, the medium of Malāvīra's teaching, the it can be said that it is not the same and it cannot be the same. We should bear in mind one fact that Mahavira's medium was spoken Ardhamāgadhi and the language of the canon is literary Ardhamāgadhi. It is an established linguistic principle that language changes from place to place and from time to time. We know that Mahavira's teachings were laughi, composed and passed on by the Ganadhares. Hence thc Ardhamagadhi of the canon, which was finally redacted and put to writing one thousand years after Mahavira's Nirvana, must have acquired, in such long course, several linguistic changes!. Moreover it is not the same type of language in all the Angas and, at times, in the same Anga. It is possibly for these reasons Hemachandra called it Arsa.20 Bul Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 ... 460