Book Title: Studies in Jainology Prakrit Literature and Languages
Author(s): B K Khadabadi
Publisher: Prakrit Bharti Academy

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 20
________________ Studies in Jainology. Prakrit - 1 + therefore, scholars like Namisadhu (on Sarasvatikanthābharana) have compared it with cloud-water : “meghanirmuktajalamiva”ló But we have to bear in mind that the various adjectives such as sarva, ascşa, nisseșa ctc., noted above, rather refer to the languages or dialects of the regions of Mahavirás religious and spiritual activities alone. To sum up this part of discussion, Mahavira preached or taught in the Ardhamagadhi language. It was the natural and unfettcred language of the common masses. It possessed a considerable number of features of the dialects of the area of his religious and instructional activities and, therefore, was understood by those people and, hence, it was the leading popular language of his time and ficld of activities. At this juncture a problem arises: Was the leading popular language, in which Mahāvīra taught, called Ardhamagadhi in his lime? And is the Ardhamāgadhĩ, the language of the canon, the same as the Ardhamāgadhĩ, the medium of Mahāvīra's teaching? As regards the first half of the problem, we have noted above that several canonical and other later works unhesitatingly say that Mahavira taught in the Ardhamāgadhi language. Both the Digambara and the Svetambara workes say so without any difference of opiniom. Moreover according to the Avašyka Niryukti : "Attham bhāsai Araha, suttam gamthamt i ganaharā niunam” The Revered One taught the law and the Ganadharas. composed it skillfully. According to tradition, Sudharmā, the fifth Ganadara, composed the Angas and the knowledge, except the 12th Anga, was preserved and passed on from tongue to tongue until it was finally put to writing at the Vallabhi Council under Devardhigani in 454 A.D. Besides, the Jaina Āgamas, unlike the Vedas, arc arthapradhāna and not sabdapradhāna c.i., the fact that Mahavira taught in Ardhamāgadhi has been authentically preserved in the canonical texts. Lastly there is no other evidence showing the otherwise of Mahavira's medium of teaching. Under these circumstances, we too have to accept unhesitatingly the literary evidence as authentic. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 ... 460