Book Title: Lover of Light Among Luminaries Dilip Kumar Roy
Author(s): Amruta Paresh Patel
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

Previous | Next

Page 106
________________ SKETCHES whole worlds of experience which fill what seems to the natural man the gap (your Russell's inner void) between the earthconsciousness and the Eternal and Infinite."44 (B) Evaluation: The string of Russell's views given here are in the context of questions. asked by Roy. Most of Russell's notions on education, religion, science and social problems represent the age in which the author and the subject lived. 97 Roy's portrait of Russell is quite authentic as far as it goes. But he has missed his basic metaphysical and epistemological principles. Russell had been a neutralist in metaphysics and a sceptic in epistemology. According to him, the universe comprises a neutral stuff which is neither mental nor material and which is divided arbitrarily and empirically by human reason and sensation into mind and matter. The neutral stuff cannot be spoken of, because the moment we speak, we turn it into subject and object dualism of our language and experience. The existence in its real character cannot be known. This is epistemological scepticism. As to Einstein, so to Russell, existence is a mystery. All the statements that Russell makes on the subject have been tentative and modest, for a sceptic cannot truthfully say that he knows the Unknowable. He criticizes dogma and priestcraft in the name of the values of goodness, beauty and truth. But if these values are the characteristic features of the essential religion, we must understand that he pleads for, not against religion. He had been bitterly critical only of the evils of the institutional faith. Therefore, no seeker after spirituality need be disturbed by his assertions, as Dilip Roy unduly seems to be. In fact, Russell's approach to religious organizations was thoroughly rational. Like a robust reformer, he rebelled against the orthodox elements prevalent in Christianity. He wished that people should use their own discrimination power before accepting any religious dogma blindly. He tried to teach them to raise doubts against the established precepts of any religion before following them. loyally. Russell found a vast gap between the religious preachings and human psychology. He also observed that because of this gap religion often lost its purpose of humanitarian concern. His disagreement with Christian concepts of hell, asceticism and Judaism were very advanced. Today many of the Western thinkers have accepted the futility of such concepts. He had liking for only one religious figure-Buddha, for his dispassionate approach to life. It is not true to say that Russell had been a complex personality, difficult to decipher. In fact, it is difficult to find a more clear-headed person than Russell in the history of philosophical thought. If style is the man, look at the style of Russell, which is always simple and direct, lucid and free from surplusage of words. This kind of simplicity and clarity come only from the mind which is free Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258