Book Title: Lover of Light Among Luminaries Dilip Kumar Roy
Author(s): Amruta Paresh Patel
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 104
________________ 95 SKETCHES its changing environment. He had high regard for the Greeks. He thought that they had far greater capacities than any average man of the modern times. To substantiate his argument he added: “We have achieved more because today the sum total of our knowledge and equipment is much greater than what the Greeks had at their disposal. Just as Einstein has reached higher than Newton because he could stand on Newton's shoulders."39 During their conversations, Russell's bold and novel opinions about a few eminent personalities like Tolstoy, Freud and Shaw are revealed. He told Roy very courageously that the Russian saint Tolstoy was a very vain man and more than that he was not cultured. Russell 'felt that vanity and self-love unconsciously impelled Tolstoy "...to fabricate a philosophy which encouraged him to feel superior to things he didn't know or couldn't understand ..... He rationalized even his lack of comprehension into a merit.'40 Freud was a great man but Russell did not agree with his theory that all the impulses of life are derived from sex. Russell felt that love of knowledge is not a sublimation of sex-energy though artistic creations are. Russell argued that human being's desire to know more and more was due to the sublimation of their love of power rather than sex. Bernard Shaw, Russell judged, was matchless. He was one of those genuinely humble men in the world whom fame and influence could not spoil. Reading of his works remained refreshing because of his truthfulness, fearlessness and fondness of cynical satire. Galsworthy was a fine artist according to Russell. But he was not so important a figure in the world of action as Wells, though Wells wasn't a great artist This apart, Bertrand Russell did not agree with Rolland's thesis that a great artist can't possibly be a bad man. He cited the instance of Dostoievsky who was a great artist but who used to cringe before the authorities during his exile in Siberia. Russell said that he 'was a notorious sneak, in fact"41 About his own writing process, Russell informed Dilip Roy that he often had to seek seclusion in country retreats to enable himself to write. He had generally not much time to correct because he had to write at a stretch and then to send it at once to the press. He confessed that he learnt the economy of words and restraint from his boyhood when he used to play with different ideas to see in how few words he could express them. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258