________________
120
Dvyāśrayakāvya
gave the credit of killing Bārapa to Cāmundarāja but as all the other chroniclers ascribe this victory to Mūlarāja, so according to A K. Majumdar', "it seems that Cāmunda fought under his father, though he may have led the army during the actual combat."
Similary Mūlarāja's expeditions against Sindhurāja?, his victory over Vigrabarāja> ; attacking and conquering northern Gujarati and his fight with Kalchūriss are omitted by Hemacandra. Again, the cause appears to be the expansionism which is omitted by Hemacandra here.
Câmunda's policy is omitted by Hemacandra. According to Forbes, "He was better than his father because he had no enemies but Yavanas, whereas according to Ray Choudhuri? by his hostility to the Sind rulers he merely carried on the policy laid down by his father.
The victory of Lāta8 by Durlabharāja is omitted by Hemacandra.
1. Majumdar, A.K. Chaulukyas of Gujarat, p. 34. 2. Ganguly D. C., History of the Paramar dynasty, p. 79. 3. (a) Bühler, G. I.A., VI. p. 184.
(b) Burgess. James, A.S.W.I. IX. p.11. 4. Bühler, G. I. 4. VI. p.182. 5. Konow, Sten, Balera Plates of Mūlarāja, E.I. X. p.77-78. 6. Forbes, Rāsamālā, p.50. 7. Ray, H.C. dynastic History of Nothern India, Calcutta, 1936,
Vol. II. p.946. 8. B.I. I. p.194 ; I.A. XII. p.197.
निर्मथ्य लाटनाथं यस्तद्रमा सक्षमां लली।
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
